The term "having sex" is specifically used by society to define two human beings engaging in sexual intercourse with each other. Again, we have a completely invalid definition. "Having sex" can only be accurately and rationally defined as: Achieving sexual release and/or pleasure. There is no sane or logical reason for why the specific sexual act known as "intercourse" is used to define the term "having sex", when an entire spectrum of literally hundreds of thousands of different types and forms of sexual activity that bring physical pleasure and cause sexual climax, should be encompassed within the term "having sex". So, what we have here, right off the bat, are two glaring examples of completely invalid interpretations of what sex is, which are overtly promoted to you diseased creatures by your evil societies, and in turn, you diseased creatures, to a tremendously high percentage, choose to embrace and accept these completely invalid definitions. Your societies have a vested interest in coercing and brainwashing you into accepting these invalid definitions, because just like in all aspects of societal life, society desires for you to believe that you enjoy "freedom", while in reality, at the very same time, brutally oppressing you and denying you all actual freedom.

There are literally hundreds of thousands of different ways that each of you could, theoretically, "have sex", using the factually accurate definition of sex, which is the personal achievement of pleasurable feelings via the stimulation of the sexual organs. Hundreds of thousands, more likely millions, of different ways. But your evil society tells, teaches, and terrorizes you into accepting the deranged notion that there are only a tiny handful of "proper" ways to have sex, and that the proper methods need to involve "attraction between two individuals", as well as a specific sex act which has been given the defining label of "intercourse". Right there, your one million+ different methods of attaining sexual pleasure/release, all of them equally valid under any sane analysis, have been reduced to 1 method, 2 methods, perhaps 5 to 10 slightly differing methods, at most.. How is it possible that you creatures can allow this to occur? How can you fail to even realize and recognize that this glaringly obvious form of fascism is being malevolently imposed upon you. Or, if you do realize this Truth, how can you simply shrug your shoulders and still claim to enjoy the glories of "sexual freedom". Your societies have chosen to impose Sacred Family Unit mythology upon you. This mythology is manifested via the imposition of utterly fascist, emotionally, culturally, and legally terrorizing sexual restrictions upon you, and this is just as true today in a country like america, as it was 1000 years ago in some medieval nation. Your society wants you to legally enslave yourself to another person of the opposite gender, to agree to have "sex" only with this other person, and to agree to create new human life forms with this other person. That is why you are given completely insane and invalid definitions of what sex is, and told that sex involves "attraction between members of the two sexes" and a specific sexual act known as "intercourse", which is the only sex act among one million+ that can and will result in the creation of a new human life form.

There are a million different ways to "have sex", meaning to achieve sexual pleasure/release. The achieving of sexual release/pleasure is the only rational purpose, within the intellectualized minds of human beings, for human beings to "have sex". Achieving a "climax" of the sexual organs provides a unique physical sensation that most people, although certainly not all, find to be highly pleasurable, on an intellectualized, emotional/instinctual level. A desire to repeat this experience in order to recreate and enjoy again this uniquely pleasurable physical experience, is what causes people to develop an obsession with "having sex" on a daily, or at the very least frequent, basis. Societal leaders recognize this natural human desire to recreate a uniquely pleasurable experience, which is really not at all harmful or troublesome in and of itself, and proceed to attach utterly perverse rules and conditions as to exactly how and within what circumstances a person "should" have sex, and it is these utterly fascist, completely unnatural, brutally manipulative and enslaving sexual rules, which cause gigantic degrees of harm, injury, and victimization to literally billions of human beings, who are coerced, cajoled, terrorized into rejecting their natural sexual instincts, and adopting the completely unnatural, viciously restrictive rules, regarding how they should "have sex", that your evil societies impose upon you.

Now, understand that procreation is a completely natural "process". It is quite true that many animal species show no indication that they derive any genuine emotional pleasure from having their sexual organs stimulated, either via self-stimulation, or via contact with another animal. On the other hand, some animal species do clearly stimulate their own sexual organs, or engage in sexual contact with other animals, not only for the purpose of procreation, but for another reason, and the only logical reason would be that the animal finds such stimulation to provide emotional/intellectual pleasure to him. Animals have a natural instinct which drives/compels them to breed, to create new members of their species. The only way they can achieve this feat is to "have sex" with each other. Animals also have intellectual and cognitive thinking skills which are less acutely developed than humans. Please note that I am not saying that animals have "inferior" intellectual and cognitive thinking skills. What I am saying is that these skills are less acutely developed than is the case with humans, and the acutely intellectualized nature of human beings is in fact not a strength, but rather a genetic weakness within the species known as humanity. Some animals are apparently unable to derive personal pleasure from the stimulation of their sexual organs. Other animals are able to derive such pleasure. In any event, most animals do have a natural, instinctual drive to procreate, and they engage in a very specific sex act, "copulation/intercourse", which offers the only method for them to achieve the instinctual procreation that they feel driven to attempt. Human beings are animals, and it is clear that in their very early evolutionary stages their sexual activity was often, possible even usually, motivated by this same instinctual compulsion to procreate. But, very early in the human evolutionary cycle, the malformed intellect and cognitive thinking patterns of humans led to a realization on the part of individuals that it was the achievement of sexual climax itself, not the "end result" of intercourse, namely procreation, which provided the primary motivation for human beings to "have sex". To achieve sexual climax provides such a unique type and powerful degree of personal pleasure to most human individuals, that they intellectually choose to override whatever instinctual motivation to procreate they have, in favor of "having sex", which is defined accurately as achieving sexual climax, purely for the emotionalized and intellectualized, personal pleasure and satisfaction that achieving sexual climax provides to them.

So, even though the main reason for why animals have sex with each other is usually rooted within an instinct for procreation, the main reason for why human beings have sex is completely different, and has to do with an intellectualized quest to achieve a unique, emotional pleasure/sensation, known as climax. In addition, the motivations which drive human beings to have sex are not genuinely instinctual in nature, while the motivations which drive all other animals to have sex are, generally and usually, although certainly not to a 100% degree, instinctual, rather than emotional or intellectualized. Whether or not human beings are better off for having turned this instinctual act into an emotionalized and intellectualized act, is an interesting question to ponder. However, it is not an extremely important issue. The profound issue at hand is clearly the fact that human beings no longer perceive or treat or undertake having sex as being an instinctual act, in any way, shape, or form. The sexual drive of human beings has lost it's instinctual nature, to a very powerful and extreme degree. At the same time, all natural instinct has not been lost, the "animal lust" which drives other animals to mate with each other for the purpose of procreation, still resides within the core consciousness of most human beings. It plays a small role in causing people to decide when to have sex, how often to have sex, whom to have sex with. But this role is not primary, or even secondary. The primary reason why people have sex is to achieve intellectual/emotional pleasure/release. The secondary reason involves embrace of certain images and ideals that their society has artificially sexualized for them, and brainwashed them into embracing. Another secondary reason involves an attempt to try to forget about and transcend the horrific reality and terrifying Truths of the person's "ordinary" life, by seeking and trying to achieve the "ultimate" in sexual pleasure/release. Yet another secondary reason involves a perverse quest by people who hate themselves at their emotional core, to feel better by convincing themselves that they are "loved" by the people that they have sex with. All of these reasons play a far more powerful, pervasive, and common role in causing people to decide whom to have sex with, when to have sex, and how often to have sex, than does the natural instinct involving procreation, which primarily motivates all other animal species to have sex.

As to the question of whether human beings are better off than animals because they have lost this natural instinct and turned sex into an intellectualized and emotionalized process, it is clear to any sane thinker that the answer is a most emphatic No. If the brain function capacity and genetic structure of the human mind were Superior in nature, it is quite possible that an argument could be made that human beings are better off, as a whole, for having developed and embraced an intellectualized method of achieving literally limitless sexual pleasure and release for themselves. But the issue is a moot one due to the fact that human brain function has proven itself to be completely inferior and perverse in nature, on thousands of different genocidal scales, throughout the entire history of humanity. Plus, the human mind has become completely and utterly malformed and diseased, on a genetic level. On top of all this, we have utterly malevolent, deranged human leaders of societies, imposing their fascist sexual ideologies upon their citizen-slaves. It is clear that the human race is in no way better off for having lost the instinctual nature of their sexual motivations, and it is also clear that while genetic malformation within the human species clearly has played the primary role in causing this loss of natural instinct, human societal and cultural leaders also have played and continue to play a major, maliciously manipulative role in deepening and enhancing the degree of sexual fascism, extreme restrictions upon sexual conduct and activity, that human beings feel compelled to embrace.

At this point, I want to go back to the issue of what "sex" is. It is the personal, individual achievement of physical/emotional pleasure, via the manipulation of the sexual organs of an individual. Yes, in some cases this "manipulation" does not have to be at all physical, it can be purely mental. Meaning, due to the intellectualized human mind, some people are able to simply think about something which sexually stimulates them, and experience not only sexual excitement, but an actual sexual climax as well, solely from their mental thoughts, with no physical manipulation of sex organs occurring. This would not qualify as "physical" manipulation, but rather mental manipulation of the sex organs. In any event, it is manipulation. Lets begin by agreeing that the current, primary purpose and goal of having sex, for most human beings, is to achieve sexual climax. Yes, it is true that some people sometimes have sex for other reasons, but achieving climax is clearly the primary, most common reason, for most people. This leaves us with the issue of methodology, the methods that are used by individuals to achieve this goal, of personal, sexual climax. How many methods are there?? An infinite number! Just as every human mind is unique, the intellectualized structure, reasons, and methods employed by each human being to try to achieve their idealized version of the "perfect" sexual climax, are utterly and completely unique. The goal of each individual is essentially the same: To achieve an extremely pleasurable sexual climax, for the purpose of providing extreme physical or emotional pleasure/release, or a combination of both physical and emotional pleasure/release. So we have trillions of human being attempting to achieve the same goal, each individual having a unique mind and unique perspective of reality, based upon the sum total of all their life experiences. Each one of the trillions of people will have a unique perspective and attitude towards the notion of sex, and of gaining sexual pleasure, shaped by the sum total of their own unique life experiences as well as the perversely coercive influence of the society into which they were born and raised and live as citizen-slaves of. Each perspective and attitude is equally valid, for each specific individual. No human being should feel culturally or societally coerced into choosing to embrace or accept any specific type of sexual ideology or restriction, or to reject any specific type of sexual ideology, because every single imaginable type of attitude and sexual path, is equally valid, based upon the unique True Reality of each individual.

But guess what, folks? Virtually every single human being on planet earth does in fact feel and is in reality not merely coerced, but outright terrorized into embracing ridiculous and completely artificial restrictions, rules, and limitations upon how they may have sex, and how they may try to achieve sexual climax. First and foremost, every single society attempts to brutally terrorize all citizen-slaves into agreeing to engage in the specific sex act known as "intercourse", and most especially in the case of young citizen-slaves, to do so only with a fertile member of the opposite sex. This specific sex act, "intercourse", is nothing more than one method, among at least a million different methods, that can be used to achieve sexual climax. The societal/cultural teaching that this method will provide the "best" sexual pleasure/climax for people, that this method is the "right" way to have sex, that a "god" creature wants people to engage in this particular sex act, etc..., are nothing more than ridiculous, blatantly transparent lies, designed to maliciously coerce citizen-slaves into embracing Sacred Family Unit mythology and choosing this particular form of "sex" over the equally valid, one million+ other forms of sex which are at their disposal. Now, it is true that other species of animals possess a natural instinct which causes most of them to choose to have sex in this very specific way, intercourse, for the instinctual purpose of procreation. But as I have already outlined above, the vast majority of human beings have lost most or all of this natural instinct. The argument that societal and cultural leaders are simply trying to "replace" this lost natural instinct by intellectually terrorizing human beings into engaging in the sex act known as intercourse, has no validity. You cannot replace a natural instinct that is supposed to dwell at the root essence of internal consciousness, with an artificial, exterior, third party, manipulative, lie and myth-based form of coercive terrorization, and claim a benevolent or justified motive. When natural instinct is lost, it is not merely lost, but also replaced. In this case the natural instinct to procreate via sex, has been replaced by an intellectual/emotional obsession with achieving sexual climax and the pleasure/release that such climax provides. Whether or not this replacement is better or worse than natural instinct is a moot point, because the natural instinct has been lost and there is no scientifically valid way to regain it. The True Reality right of genetically diseased human beings to embrace their intellectual/emotional obsession, is valid. Society has no moral or ethical right to try to artificially manipulate and coerce their citizens into rejecting their True Reality and embracing fascist, unnatural, restrictions and rules regarding their sexual pursuits and activities. Yes, the use of the word "unnatural" is appropriate here. Human beings had a natural instinct, in their early evolutionary stage, to engage in the specific sex act known as intercourse. This natural instinct has now been lost. It is unnatural for human beings today, who have lost this natural instinct, to be subjected to artificial, invalid, terroristic coercion at the hands of empowered societal/cultural leaders, which is designed to get them to believe that they have any type of a moral, ethical, cultural, humanistic, or other obligation to engage in sexual intercourse.

Sexual intercourse is a very specific and unique type of sex act. It is a mating ritual. It requires that two human beings arrange their bodies in a very specific manner, and interact their sexual organs with each other, in a very specific way. It is a very rigid way to have sex. This doesn't mean that some people don't derive great pleasure from this particular method of having sex. And for a few people, no other method of having sex is as personally pleasurable as intercourse, although this has to be seen within the context of Truth, that most of these people have never felt sexually free, have never tried out more than a handful of other types of ways to achieve sexual climax, and have felt coerced and terrorized by their society into choosing to embrace and extol the specific, societally advocated sex act known as intercourse. The fact is, even though all methods of having sex are equally valid on a uniquely individual level, intercourse is clearly one of the less effective, less enjoyable, less empowering, and less free ways of having sex. Remember, the primary goal of having sex, within human society here in the 21st century, is to derive a maximum degree of physical and emotional pleasure/release, via the process and the act of achieving sexual climax. Intercourse is one of the least effective ways to achieve this goal, because it rigidly requires that two people interact with each other sexually in a specific, ritualized manner, allowing virtually no deviation from the "standard script" of how intercourse is to occur. It is less enjoyable because it imposes such a strict limitation on exactly how the sexual climax must occur. For women especially, it is less empowering than many other ways to have sex, because it requires the female to take on a subservient role and basically just accept the domineering thrusts of the male, as part of the intercourse rules. It is one of the least free of all ways to have sex, for the reasons I have outlined above, the rigidity, extreme narrowness of allowable technique variation, and perhaps even more importantly, because it specifically requires that two human beings, not one, not three, not four+, but only two, participate in the sexual activity. One person cannot have "intercourse". Neither can three people together, or four, or five, or more. Intercourse imposes an absolute requirement that two human beings participate together, in the act of "having sex", no less, and no more than two. This is clearly one of the most brutally restrictive forms of sex imaginable, and the fact that societies choose to terroristically coerce as many citizen-slaves as possible into agreeing to choose and accept this one specific way of having sex, above all other million+ ways, is an absolute outrage and a beautiful illustration of how utterly and completely unfree and brutally fascist your societies are, in all cultural and behavioral/lifestyle venues.

Okay, now that intercourse has been somewhat dissected and it's Forbidden Truths revealed, lets consider other ways that people have sex, and examine their relative benefits and drawbacks. But first, sticking with intercourse, we have to discuss one other reason why this particular way of having sex for the purpose of achieving personal pleasure and climax, is so very inferior and dangerous. It is the factual reality of creating offspring, and the extreme danger that creating offspring carries with it, due to insane societal law and doctrine. Most human beings who have sex are not interested in creating children. This is not the reason why they are having sex. They are having sex because they want to experience the uniquely pleasurable physical/emotional sensations that achieving a sexual climax provides. Even in cases where the individual has had children in the past, or might be thinking about having children in the future, the odds are extremely high that the person is not trying to create a child every time she/he has sex, and specifically does not want to create a child every time she/he has sex. But out of all the million+ different ways to have sex, only one, vaginal intercourse, is specifically designed in such a way as to always carry a risk/possibility of creating a child. And if a child is created, even if one or both creators stridently maintain that they did not want to create a child and do not desire to become caretakers to the child in any way, shape, or form, your utterly evil and perverse society imposes a tremendous amount of cultural, moral, and legal coercion/terrorization and outright brutalization, upon the creators, ordering and compelling them to assume the role of "parent", and embrace the 21+ years of fascist legal obligation, cultural coercion, and financial drain that is involved, even though the creators did nothing "wrong", and simply engaged in a legal sexual act, with a clear desire and intent to achieve sexual pleasure/climax, not to be subjected to the horrific, undesired burden of assuming ownership of and "raising" another human being for 21+ long years of their incredibly short, irreplaceable lives. So, even though intercourse is the single most encouraged, sanctified and specific way of having sex that your evil societies promote and coerce you creatures into engaging in, it is at the same time also the single most dangerous way of having sex imaginable, as well as one of the very least pleasurable/freeing/empowering. No other way of having sex carries with it the significant danger of "accidently" creating a child, as intercourse does. And if this "accident" should occur, the consequences that society imposes upon you pathetic, brainwashed citizen-slaves, are absolutely horrific. You lose hundreds of thousands of dollars, you become legally and culturally chained, bound, attached to a child and to your sex partner for 21+ years, you are forced to completely alter and change your lifestyle, every imaginable type of brutal, fascist enslavement is imposed upon you, for doing nothing wrong, simply for having sex in the specific, inferior manner that your society has terroristically coerced and convinced you to have sex.

Understand this: Your society wants you to create children. That is why it chooses to trumpet intercourse as being the best and only proper way to have sex. How utterly outrageous it is that for those of you who embrace intercourse, as a direct result of societal coercion, and do create children despite having had no intention or desire to do so, the exact same, utterly torturous societal punishments are imposed upon you, as is the case with a person who wanted to create a child and might want to serve as a parent. The only reason why you created the child, against your will, is because out of the million+ different ways to have sex, your society, overtly, manipulatively, and via the use of lies and false, invalid information, coerced you into choosing to engage in intercourse, by giving you pure lies, pure myths, pure falsehood, within it's coercive, deceitful campaign of intercourse promotion and imposition. You, the victim, are then subjected to a lifetime of punishment by your victimizer, society, via the insane decree that because you created a child by having sex, you somehow become immensely and completely obligated to assume custody of, care for, raise, pay for the needs of the child, for a minimum of 21 years. You are told that you have a moral, ethical, cultural, and if all these ridiculous notions are rebuffed, a legal obligation to assume these incredibly difficult, life-changing, undesired tasks and parental role, even though you did nothing wrong and it is in reality the complete fault of society, that you felt compelled to undertake this one, specific, inferior, highly dangerous form of having sex, intercourse, in the first place. How utterly outrageous!

Superior and Alternative Ways to have Sex:

We have to begin here with me repeating what sex is. Understanding the True, accurate definitions of primary societal concepts, terms, and words, is extremely important, folks. It is the key to recognizing and embracing Truth. Your societies use false, invalid, irrational, manipulative definitions of terms, concepts, and words, which serve to strip you of the ability to think rationally, to recognize Truth, and to arrive at sane, factually accurate conclusions and philosophies. When I repeat myself within these Texts, I do so because I am revealing an extremely important and profound Truth, which directly contradicts and reverses a societal lie and myth and brainwashing that the vast majority of you creatures have been subjected to and have tragically been coerced into embracing as Truth, even though it is an irrational, illogical, oftentimes insane, falsehood. In repeating myself, I hopefully manage to drive these difficult Truths into your thick, societally victimized skulls. So, with this preface, let me say again: Sex is the individual, physical and/or emotional achievement of sexual pleasure/release, via the manipulation/stimulation of your sexual organs, with a usual goal of gaining a sexual climax, which is defined as "the height of sexual excitement", and is usually followed by a release of sexual energy that many human beings find to be extremely pleasurable, as it provides a unique physical sensation. This definition is equally True and valid for both genders, male and female. Let us move on to two extremely important new points: 1: There is absolutely no intrinsic link or connection between sex and love. 2: There is absolutely no validity to the notion that sex should or needs to involve contact between two human beings in order to be appropriate, normal, or to provide ideal sexual satisfaction/pleasure.

Point #1: Having sex is an individual, and an individualistic activity. A person who has sex, unless he or she is deliberately and specifically seeking to create a child, has sex for the purpose of gaining the physical and emotional pleasure/release that experiencing sexual stimulation, excitement, and climax, provides. This is a selfish, self-centered, individualistic motivation, and there is absolutely nothing wrong with that, other than the perverse societal refusal to accept and acknowledge this Truth. The notion that a person should only "have sex" with another person that he "loves", is utterly and completely ludicrous and nonsensical, the only thing more ludicrous is the perverse notion that a person should only "have sex" with someone he is married to. The notion that some type of a link exists between sex and love, is equally ridiculous and truly bizarre. As I will explain further down on this page, in my dissection of love, this term only has validity when applied to oneself. Familial/friendship-based affection can only be defined accurately as "affection", not love, while romantic love is nothing more than a completely artificial construct of society. Having sex is an individualistic, self-centered act. An ideal sexual partner, assuming one chooses to have sex with a partner, would be either a person who wants to help indulge your desire to have sex, for whatever reason, to help you achieve the maximum amount of sexual pleasure possible, or a person who wants to have pleasurable sex too, and is interested in trying to maximize the sexual pleasure that both he and you can enjoy. Whether or not you feel intellectualized or emotionalized "affection" for the other person, which your society invalidly defines with the term "love", is a very minor, insignificant factor, and the notion that you are "supposed" to feel such affection for the person you engage in sexual contact with, makes no logical sense. The person who wants to have sex is simply attempting to achieve individual, personal, sexual pleasure/release. There is absolutely no reason or need for the person to feel intellectual or emotional affection towards anyone, much less towards a specific "sex partner", in order to achieve this goal. Furthermore, the claim that sex is somehow more "satisfying", richer or more intense, when you have sex with someone that you feel deep affection towards, is completely invalid as well. The degree of pleasure and satisfaction that any individual might enjoy and derive from having sex, is dependent upon the unique attitude, intellectual interests, mental/emotional obsessions, individual physical factors such as health and stamina, and the True Reality of the individual. Yes, it is true that for a few people, who have sexual contact with another person that they feel deep affection towards, the sexual pleasure they derive is extremely intense, and would be difficult for the individual to achieve on his own, or with another person that he does not feel deep affection for. However, for society to decree that all, most, or even a majority of human beings should, do, or must fit into this category, is utterly ridiculous and completely false. Perhaps one person out of 1000 would genuinely be unable to achieve an equal or greater degree of sexual pleasure/release, via any method other than sexual contact with the one person that they claim to feel the deepest amount and degree of affection for. 1 out of 1000 is a tiny minority, and on top of everything else, this tiny minority will, in most cases, be unable to achieve sexual satisfaction in other ways, only due to the lifetime of societal brainwashing and invalid mythological indoctrination, that they have been subjected to.

Your societies have created a mythology which revolves around "romantic love", and brutally addicted all of you, male and female, into accepting this mythology as constituting valid, factual Truth. There is no such thing as romantic love. There is carnal, selfish obsession with achieving sexual pleasure, release, and climax. The issue of whether carnality and selfishness are "good" things or not, is not relevant here. The reality is that human beings are carnal and selfish and I certainly do not consider either one of these character traits to be negative. No sane and rational thinker could ever attach negative labels to the natural human character traits of selfishness and carnality. But your evil societies are determined to reign in your sexual freedom and autonomy, to coerce you into "voluntarily" agreeing to limit and narrow the types of sexual pleasure you seek out, the amount and frequency of sexual pleasure you enjoy, and the type/number of fellow human beings that you engage in sexually pleasurable activities with. This is where the mythology of romantic love, along with many other cultural, societal, and religious lies and brainwashings, are viciously imposed upon you by your societies. The invalid notion of love is used to convince you to try and find a single human being to "have sex" with, for a very long time, on the basis of both irrational exclusivity and mutual compromise, that is virtually guaranteed to limit and lessen the amount and the degree of personal sexual pleasure/release that you will achieve in your life. Once you are deluded into believing that you feel "romantic love" for someone, society sets out to enslave you to that one person. You are taught and told that you need to inhibit and restrain your sexuality with regard to any situation that does not involve physical contact with the one person that you are supposed to romantically love, then you are further coerced into moving in with that person, then you are further coerced into creating children by having intercourse with that person, then you are further coerced into agreeing to marry that person. At each step, the noose of brutal enslavement is further tightened around your neck. With each step, you dig yourself into a deeper hole, and by the time you create a child or get married, not only have you lost all of your personal freedom and autonomy on a cultural, pseudo-moral level, but the legal system is gleefully thrust upon you by your evil society, and you become legally terrorized, under the overt threat of severe punishment, including imprisonment, into agreeing to serve as a "husband", a "wife", a "parent", a "sexual partner", to one or two specific human beings, for the rest of your lifetime, or at the very least, for an extremely long period of time, such as 21+ years. I cannot imagine a more blatant and obvious demonstration of brutal fascism, being directly imposed upon you by your government and by your society. But somehow, you pathetic creatures can't seem to grasp or realize the reality of this most obvious form of fascism, and you blindly continue to labor under the delusion that you are "lucky to be free". The myth of "romantic love" existing, or playing any type of a legitimate role in shaping or dictating the sexual life choices and life path of any individual, is the very first step on this immensely harmful journey, in which you lose your freedom, you lose your autonomy, you lose your ability to make rational decisions regarding your own sexual activities.

Point #2: Having sex means individually seeking and achieving sexual please/release/climax. Unless a person is specifically having sex only because he or she desires to create a child, sex is a solo, individual activity. It is not a "couple" activity. A good analogy for this Truth would be driving a car. Driving a car is an individual activity. The driver of a car has absolutely no need to have another human being inside the car with him, as he drives. He can have another person with him, and it's possible that he might enjoy the drive more by having a person in the car with him, but there is absolutely no need for the other person to be there, the odds are higher that any person in the car will only distract him and make his driving more difficult, and the notion that he will somehow be committing a morally or culturally horrific act simply by driving the car by himself, is ludicrous. With regard to sex, your evil and lie-based societies have deluded you into thinking and believing that you really need to be together with one other person, and to have sexually intimate contact with that person, every time you wish to have sex. This is completely ludicrous! Sex is an individual act, like driving a car, going online, eating a sandwich, etc... A person having sex is trying to achieve sexual pleasure/release/climax, via the stimulation of his/her sexual organs. Stimulation of sexual organs is an individual act. It is best achieved by envisioning images, situations, or experiences that a person has sexualized within his mind, and/or physically rubbing, massaging, or creating friction upon ones sexual organs.

It is clear to any sane thinker that even though all million+ unique variations on how sex can be engaged in are equally valid, to unique individuals, there are fundamentally Superior advantages to sexual activities in which just one person sexually stimulates himself, without having any sexual contact with another person. By the way, in this essay as well as throughout these Texts, my use of the term "he" and "him" is not meant to be gender-specific. It is used solely for the sake of convenience, and you are expected to recognize that I am referring to all human beings, male and female, when I use a term such as "he", "him", or "himself". Simply substitute the word "she, her, and herself", if you wish, since all these comments, unless I overtly specify otherwise, apply with equal validity to both male and female human beings. Back to the issue at hand: The ideal, most strongly satisfying way for a solid majority of human beings to have sex, is to do so alone, in private, and via self-stimulation of their own sexual organs. This Superior activity has been labeled by society with the demonizing term of masturbation. I do not enjoy using this word, because it is a demonizing societal label, but for the sake of convenience and clarity I will use this term within this essay. Masturbation is the deliberate, self-stimulation of an individuals sexual organs, by the individual himself. Because it provides the ideal way to maximize sexual pleasure and release, while at the same time challenging all Sacred Family Unit mythology, the specific act of masturbation and it's proponents have been relentlessly and viciously demonized and condemned by virtually all human societies throughout the history of the Modern Era. Your evil societal leaders have absolutely no interest in providing you with Truth, or the ability to maximize pleasure or enjoyment in your own lives. Perversely, the exact opposite is the goal of your societal leaders, to lie to you, to manipulate you, to provide you with the false and invalid illusion that your pleasure and contentment is sought, when in reality it is your brutal oppression and victimization, that has always been the True goal of your deranged, perverse, truth-hating, malevolent human societal leaders. Back in the middle ages, up to 50 years ago in many societies, when your leaders knew you to be totally ignorant, you were terrorized with claims that if you masturbated, you would go blind, become crippled, become feeble-minded, or otherwise endure horrifically negative consequences for daring to embrace the pursuit of ultimate sexual pleasure/release via masturbation. When medical researchers/scientists finally debunked this ridiculous notion, doing so at great personal peril by the way, since societies are famous for destroying and murdering any human who dares to reveal a Truth which directly challenges societally decreed important toxic mythologies, your evil societal leaders simply redoubled their insane efforts to convince you that you have a moral, ethical, or cultural mandate to refrain from embracing masturbation, using once again, nothing but purely perverse lies and deranged claims, often seeped in religious insanity, regarding what types of sexual activities are "proper and acceptable".

Tragically, as of the year 2001, absolutely no legitimate enlightenment on any primary issue of human sexuality, has occurred within any human society. You are deluded into believing that you enjoy sexual freedom because you are no longer thrown into a lunatic asylum for masturbating, but the reality is that the exact same, utterly brutal and pervasive stigma against masturbation, which has been imposed upon you creatures for thousands of years, continues to be imposed with just as much relentless viciousness and effectiveness, today. Millions of people each year, in america, proudly and publically announce they have gotten married, invite other people to attend their wedding ceremonies, proudly declare that they intend to live with each other and engage in exclusive, romantic-based sexual activity with each other. Millions of people do this each year, because it is a societally advocated, promoted, and celebrated toxic ritual.

How many people proudly and publically announce that they intend to solely engage in masturbation, the single safest and potentially most pleasurable type of sexual activity, for the rest of their lives??? Zero!! Why is this? Why would a hundred million people each year proudly & publically announce their intention to have sex with a single, other human being for an extremely long period of time, while zero people proudly and publically announce their intention to have sex only via masturbation, for a very long time?? The answer is obvious to any sane thinker: Masturbation and it's practitioners continue to be brutally, unrelentingly demonized and condemned on all levels, by all human societies, with just as much insane intensity today, as was the case 300, 500, 1000 years ago.

Your leaders are in mortal terror of masturbation, even more so than atheism, because masturbation represents everything that your evil societies are determined to destroy and take away from you creatures. Masturbation represents and offers personal freedom, personal autonomy. Masturbation eliminates the need for people to have families, wives, live-in lovers, children, in order to enjoy ultimate sexual pleasure/release. Masturbation provides a Superior form of sexual pleasure, free of all the toxic entanglements and compromises that are a hallmark of all exclusive, two-person sexual relationships. This is why your leaders have always been, and remain today, desperately obsessed and determined to demonize masturbation, to use whatever insane lies and myths it possibly can, to convince you to choose some other form of seeking and achieving sexual pleasure, to be specific: An intercourse-based, Sacred Family Unit, terroristically exclusive and toxically enmeshed type of two-person voluntary enslavement sexual pleasure system, such as "marriage", which is literally and factually guaranteed to limit, restrict, and reduce the amount and degree of sexual pleasure/release that you achieve within your lifetime.

I am not saying that masturbation is the "only proper way" to have pleasurable/satisfying sex. I'm not even saying that masturbation would offer the most satisfying sexual pleasures to all, or even most, people. What I am saying is that it is clear, beyond all doubt, to any logical and sane thinker, that given the fact that human beings no longer have sex for the primary purpose and intention of creating children, and given the fact that the personal achievement of sexual pleasure/climax is inherently an individualized activity, most mentally healthy human beings, were they not victims of societal brainwashing and moral/cultural terrorization, would find that on a physical as well as on a mental level, masturbation provides them with a superior way to maximize their sexual pleasure, satisfaction, and release. This doesn't mean that most people would become isolated loners, because there is no valid connection between the instinctual need for human companionship, which most people still retain, and the issue of having sex. Your diseased societies have established a ridiculous claim that you need to have a "lover" in your life, a person that you feel romantic love towards, and you further need to establish a close relationship with this person, that extends far beyond just having sex. You need to have both "friends" and a "lover", a sexual lover, or else you are being greatly deprived of an extremely important, valuable, and necessary portion of life. This notion is pure poppycock! No pun intended :-) Yes, most human beings, certainly not all, but most, do benefit significantly from having ongoing, friendly relationships with other human beings. But the issue of having sex, achieving sexual pleasure and satisfaction in one's own life, need have absolutely nothing to do with having any type of a "relationship" with anyone. Because you do have an instinctual need for human "friends", your deviously malevolent society falsely convinces you that you need to choose one other human being, a "friend", and make this person your sexual partner, for life. The reality is, you do not have an instinctual need to have a sexual partner, you simply have a need to achieve sexual pleasure/climax, and for most people, the safest, easiest, most effective way to meet this need, is via masturbation.

Within any sane society, the benefits and advantages of masturbation would be constantly, openly, touted and glorified. Celebrities, politicians, sports stars, teachers, all people who enjoy a position of respect or influence within the society, would actively and publically proclaim that they consider masturbation to be an ideal way to obtain sexual pleasure and release. The Truth would be told to you creatures, by people who have influence over your life path decisions. You would be told, over and over, that masturbation is absolutely the safest way to have sex. You would be told, over and over, that you have the mental and physical ability to achieve a limitless degree of sexual pleasure and release, all by yourself, that you have no need for a "sexual partner" in order to claim this achievement for yourself. You would be told that of course masturbation is just as "valid" a way to have sex, as any other method. Of course there are no moral, ethical, physical, or other negative effects or drawbacks, of any kind, to embracing masturbation, proudly and with as much intensity and devotion as you may wish to give to this personal activity. You would be told that the only type of valid "love", on a sexual/romantic scale, is love that is directed to oneself, and that the most perfect way to display such self-love, sexually, is to embrace and indulge in the physical and emotional pleasures that masturbation offers. You would be told that you don't need anyone else, to get your own sexual needs met. It doesn't matter if you are sexually attracted to animals, to children, to violent terrorization of others, to people who would never agree to have sex with you, etc... It doesn't matter because regardless of what your sexual attraction to other living things may be, you do not need to actually have any physical contact or interaction with them, in order to enjoy and achieve the ultimate in sexual pleasure/release, for yourself. This last Truth alone, would result in an immediate, significant drop in the number of animals who are sexually abused, the number of children who are sexually abused/raped, the number of women who are raped, the number of people who are stalked and terrorized as a result of a sexual obsession/attraction that is not reciprocal in nature. Mind you, there would still be sexual abuse/rape/terrorization of animals, children, women, and men, because some violent sexual acts are motivated primarily by intense, True Reality based rage, rather than a simple desire to be loved, to build up a tortured, societally destroyed ego, or to enjoy the ultimate in sexual pleasure/release. Sexual victimization that is motivated primarily by personal rage, would still occur. But a significant percentage of all sexual victimization of other living things, is not primarily motivated by True Reality rage, but rather by an inability to love oneself, an inability to recognize that masturbation offers just as intense and pleasurable a release of sexual energy as any other type of sex act offers, or a desperate, irrational obsession with finding and obtaining something that does not exist, namely, the romantic love of another person. If the Truths regarding masturbation were openly revealed, constantly disseminated to you creatures, and publically promoted by all of your societal leaders and empowered agents, most sexual victimization that is not motivated primarily by True Reality rage, hate, and a personal quest for cathartic vengeance, would cease to occur. A person who is sexually attracted to animals, as an example, would realize that unless he overtly feels a True Reality need to hurt and harm animals, there really is no reason for him to actively seek out animals to have sex with. He will love himself, so he does not need to create and embrace the illusion that the animal romantically loves him. He will recognize and know that he can control his sexuality, he can create sexual images, scenarios, and fantasies in his mind that allow him to experience sexual pleasure and release which is just as intense as would be the case with having personal, sexual contact with an animal. He will have no misgivings, no moral or ethical or philosophical qualms regarding masturbation, because he will know the Truth, having been taught the Truth by his society. He will not labor under the perverse, toxic delusion that he "needs" to share his sexual activity/pleasure with any other living thing. These exact same profound realizations of Truth would apply to those who are sexually attracted to children, to certain classes of people who are unlikely to agree to have sex with them, etc... A majority of people who sexually assault children, do not have a primary, True Reality motivation of wanting to harm the child. Some do, but not a majority. The majority want to be loved by the child they attack, they seek the idyllic fantasy of "romantic love" that their society has brainwashed them into believing is valid and exists. They seek to recapture within themselves, the emotional innocence and openness that their evil society gradually stripped from them during the course of their own childhood. They want to enjoy the best possible sexual experience, to achieve the greatest degree of sexual pleasure/release, and their society has taught them that this requires them to have intimate, sexual contact with the living creature that they are sexually attracted to. This is often why they choose to target and sexually assault the child. You can say that it is "selfish" of them to make this choice, but this claim has no relevancy. They are laboring under completely false and invalid myths and lies regarding sex and sexual activity, that their society has malevolently imposed upon them, and compelled them to embrace. Besides which, selfishness is a perfectly appropriate, natural, non-toxic ideology to embrace in ones life path. Only selfishness that has been tainted and warped by lies, myths, and hypocrisy, causes significant harm to other living things. In a sane society, based upon Truth, a great many people would choose to "selfishly" engage in masturbation, because they would feel and recognize that it offers them the best way to achieve the ultimate in sexual pleasure/release. Nobody would be harmed by this. But in an insane society, based upon lies, a great many people "selfishly" choose to sexually impose themselves upon children, women, animals, and other living things who are not interested in having sex with them, because they are laboring under the false illusions that romantic love exists, that they need to be sexually loved by another living thing, that they need to have physical contact with the specific type of living thing that they are sexually attracted to, that sexual contact with other living things provides the best, most pleasurable sexual release, that masturbation is wrong and an inferior, unacceptable way to have sex. All of these notions are nothing more than toxic lies. And they directly cause a tremendous amount of trauma, suffering, and harm to living things, which would not occur if the toxic lies were not embraced by you citizen-slaves, as a collective group and on an individual basis.

I want to go back to the car driving analogy. Imagine if two people tried to drive the same car at the same time. Would this be easy, or difficult?? It would be difficult! One person would hit the brake earlier than the other person. One person would want to make a right turn, the other would decide to keep going straight. One person would want to drive at noon, the other person might prefer to drive at midnight, etc... Two people attempting to undertake this task, would find it more difficult, more stressful, less effective, than one person. This is because driving is an individualistic activity. The same is true for having sex. Intercourse for the specific purpose of having children, is a two-person task. But having sex is a one person task, because having sex, among 21st century human beings, involves an individual choice and desire to gain sexual pleasure/release, assuming that a very specific desire to create a child is not the primary motivation in play at the time that the decision to have sex, is made. If two people try to have sex with each other, it is clear that the chances of both people achieving the greatest degree of physical/emotional pleasure they possibly can, are extremely remote. Each person has to compromise, to adjust and modify their actions and interactions with the other person, in order for the sexual encounter to occur. Each person is expected to consider the needs and desires of the other person, and this requires modification of the person's own sexual needs and desires. Even more importantly, there is no way that any person can know exactly what the other person desires, what the other person finds most sexually pleasurable, or exactly what pace the other person is taking in their mind, as far as building up towards a sexual climax. So, what you have in a typical, two-person sexual encounter, is each person secretly wanting the other person to provide them with the ultimate in sexual pleasure/release, but each person is instinctually more interested in gaining this ultimate sexual pleasure for himself, than in giving this ultimate sexual pleasure to the other person, because sex for pleasure is an individualistic act. Even if a person might have a purely altruistic desire to give the other person the ultimate in sexual pleasure, it is virtually impossible to do, because nobody is a mind reader. Nobody can know, in real-time, second by second, what another person is thinking or feeling. You can only know what you are thinking, feeling, experiencing. This is why masturbation is certain to provide the ultimate in sexual pleasure/release, to most sane, rational, Truth-based human beings. The masturbator knows exactly what he is thinking, feeling, experiencing. The masturbator can control the pace of his sexual adventure to perfection, slowing it down, speeding it up, at will, with no need to adjust or compromise to the pace of any other person, such as is the case with all two-person sexual encounters. The masturbator does not need to worry/concern himself with satisfying another person, he only needs to worry about satisfying himself. And because sex for physical/emotional pleasure is an individualistic act, just like driving a car is, the advantages derived from doing the task personally and alone, strongly outweigh the advantages of doing the task in a "directly linked" manner, with another person, such as occurs with intercourse, and the other societally approved of and promoted types of two-person sexual activity. The fact that a person very likely enjoys having friends, enjoys having "relationships" with other people, has absolutely no bearing upon whether having sexual relationships with other people would improve their quality of life, on either a sexual or a non-sexual level. In other words, a person may derive significant benefits from having friends, and significant benefits from having ongoing, affectionate relationships with other human beings, but the notion that such a person needs or would benefit from choosing to specifically have sex with another person, is not necessarily valid or accurate.

Now, keep in mind that I am in no way making this Truth out to be universally applicable. Some human beings can't meet their own needs, they hate themselves and are obsessed with getting other human beings to engage in sex acts with them, because that is the only way they can emotionally delude themselves into feeling that they are lovable and worthy of enjoying the pleasure of sexual release/climax. Some humans are more emotionally interested in giving pleasure to other people than in giving pleasure to themselves, again due to a lack of properly narcissistic self-love. Some humans simply do not like or enjoy the physical sensations that having sex provides, others do not like or enjoy the emotions that having sex stirs up within them, often because they were sexually tortured and victimized as children, etc... What I am saying, very emphatically, is that in any sane, benevolent, genuinely free society, masturbation would be overtly promoted by all empowered leaders and agents. It would be recognized and revealed to be a perfectly valid, extremely useful and in many cases Superior way for citizens to meet their own sexual needs/desires, with the greatest possible likelihood of achieving the ultimate in sexual fulfillment. Intercourse, on the other hand, would certainly not be condemned, but the Truths concerning intercourse would be openly and publically revealed. The fact that it is an extremely dangerous way to have sex, the fact that it requires a compromise on the part of participants, that often limits the degree of sexual pleasure which is achieved by either one or both parties, the fact that it can result in the creation of an undesired child, etc... Masturbation does not carry any of these extremely significant drawbacks, and it is utterly outrageous that these facts are not publically disseminated and revealed and discussed, by your societal and cultural leaders. That masturbation continues to be demonized and condemned, while intercourse, a far more dangerous, inferior, far less effective way to have sex, continues to be sanctified and terroristically imposed upon you creatures as the only "valid" way to have sex, is even more outrageous and perverse.

I'm not going to get into a long discussion of sexually transmitted diseases, but a few points have to be made: Masturbation is not only the most effective way for most people to have sex, but it is absolutely the safest way, for all people to have sex. There is no safer method in existence, and I am not talking about avoiding the creation of children here, but rather becoming infected with a disease such as AIDS, hepatitis, herpes, etc... So, even if for some people masturbation offers somewhat less physical/emotional pleasure/release than intimate sexual contact with another person may offer, this has to be weighed against the fact that no type of intimate sexual contact can be or is as safe, as masturbation is. Given this fact, why in the world would the practice of "safe sex", via the use of condoms and the like, receive a ton of societal attention and promotion, while the safest type of sex in existence, masturbation, continues to be relentlessly condemned and demonized?? Here you have an absolutely beautiful illustration of the utterly malevolent nature of your insane, evil societies. Your societal leaders know that all types of intimate sexual contact between two or more people are dangerous, potentially fatal, and that intercourse, while not the single most dangerous type of intimate sexual contact, is without a doubt one of the most dangerous types of intimate sexual contact. Your leaders also know, as does any rational thinker, that the vast majority of all teen-age and adult citizen-slaves are intellectually and emotionally obsessed, in most cases instinctually obsessed as well, with having sex. Knowing this, you creatures are advised to still engage in intimate sexual contact with another person, but to consider trying to minimize the danger by using a condom and via other "safe sex" practices. If you creatures don't want to engage in intimate sexual contact with another person, you are simply advised to "not have sex", even though everyone knows that most people are quite obsessed with having sex. The single safest and best way to have sex, masturbation, is completely ignored, dismissed, and condemned. You are told by society that it's far better to have highly dangerous, potentially fatal sex, and far better to slightly mitigate the danger by using a condom, and far better to completely deny yourself all sexual pleasure/release, than it is to have 100% safe sex, that is Superior in nature and allows most people to achieve the ultimate in sexual pleasure, greater than intercourse provides. How utterly perverse! You are literally being ordered by society to risk your life, if you want to enjoy sexual pleasure, and that the safe way to have sex, the best way to have sex, is unacceptable! And you creatures accept this order. This situation provides a perfect illustration of core, fundamental derangement with the human fabric of consciousness. Your society, deliberately and with malice aforethought, strips you of the ability to love yourself, terroristically coercing you into embracing the insane notion that you need to find somebody else willing to have sex with you, in order to "feel loved", in order to restore just a tiny fragment of the most precious and real love of all, self-love, that it has malevolently taken away from you. How incredibly outrageous and perverse this undeniable Truth is!

A few words here on sexual abstinence and the use of condoms. Assuming that you are fertile, society wants you, first and foremost, to engage in vaginal, intercourse sexual contact with a fertile member of the opposite gender. This is what your diseased societies want and demand of you. Yes, leaders would prefer that you be enslaved to the person you engage in this form of sex with, via the insane marriage ritual. But within 21st century "civilized" societies, the primary obsession of societal leaders is to get you to breed. To create as many child-slaves as is possible, regardless of whether you are married, regardless of how old or young you may be. Your society does not want you to be sexually abstinent, even if it publically claims to be interested in promoting sexual abstinence among it's youth population. This is simply a lie, one of thousands of lies that you creatures are fed by your evil governmental and societal leaders each and every day of your lives. In order to appease the large number of adults who are obsessed with the insane god myth, the toxic ritual of marriage, and are sexually repressed and in fact terrified of the very notion of anyone enjoying any type of sexual pleasure, societal leaders publically and falsely claim to be seeking to convince children as well as adults who not married, to abstain from having vaginal intercourse and to convince such humans to abstain from sex. But the Truth is that vaginal intercourse is deliberately fetishized and promoted to all human beings, including children, as being the most wonderful, pleasurable activity imaginable. The very fact that the public decrees by societal leaders instruct children that having sex is a "taboo" thing to do, while at the same time informing children that it is the ultimate act of pleasure and maturity, guarantees that almost all children will become obsessed with having sexual contact with fellow humans, usually peer age fellow children, and will specifically try to engage in the sex act that society instructs them to be the only "proper" way to have sex, namely vaginal intercourse. Societal leaders completely understand that by publically telling children not to have this type of sex, they are making it much more likely that children will choose to engage not only in sexual activity, but in this one very specific form of sexual activity, the only form that carries with it the significant danger of creating a new life form. As to condoms and other "birth control" devices, let me begin by asking you pathetic creatures this question: Have you ever seen or heard condoms being marketed to married people?? No! In fact, if a married person were to publically proclaim, with pride, that he always uses condoms, this perfectly Superior revelation would be met with ridicule, mocking, and condemnation by his society and by you brainwashed citizen-slaves. Married people, even if they don't desire to create a child, are culturally coerced by society into engaging in dangerous, unprotected sex, for the specifically malevolent, fascist purpose of trying to get every married couple to breed. Condoms and other birth control devices are only marketed to children and to unmarried citizen-slaves, but once again, this is not done out of any altruistic motivation to try and help these humans to avoid creating children. The reasons why children and unmarried humans are culturally allowed and to some degree encouraged to use condoms and birth control include: 1: A societal desire to try and coerce them into getting married by telling them that once they are married they can stop using condoms, and that sexual intercourse is even more pleasurable when no condom or other birth control device is used. 2: A societal desire to encourage children and unmarried humans to get used to engaging in vaginal intercourse, to addict them to this one specific type of sexual activity, knowing that sooner or later, even if birth control is regularly used, most humans will mess it up, forget, run out of condoms, etc..., and the desired societal result of breeding will occur. 3: Once again, societal leaders understand and recognize the inferiority of you creatures, all too well. They know that most humans, especially children, hate themselves, feel worthless, and are intellectually immature. If children, as well as adults, are told that one way of doing something is safer than another way, but the safer way is also less pleasurable, many of them will choose the more dangerous method, either due to intellectual immaturity, or, even more commonly, emotional feelings of personal worthlessness, self-loathing, and even a suicidal outlook regarding their own lives. So, let us understand that your societal leaders, despite their claims to be interested in promoting sexual abstinence as well as birth control usage among children and unmarried adults, do not in fact desire to achieve these claimed goals. Your leaders have far more important and sincere goals, such as to get you to breed, to enslave you to your sexual partner, and to culturally coerce and addict you to one, specific, inferior way of having sex, vafinal intercourse.

Moving on, let us consider the following scenario: Two people, friends who feel comfortable with each other and affectionate towards each other, get together and individually masturbate while together, perhaps sexually touching/stimulating each other as well, with their hands. This would be a perfectly safe way to have sex, and enjoy the "companionship" of another person at the same time. Would this type of Superior sexual activity meet with societal approval?? No! Your diseased society insists upon intimate sexual contact between the two parties, with intercourse being by far the most intensively promoted specific type of intimate sexual contact. A mutual type of masturbation receives just as much condemnation and demonization as solo masturbation, because your societal leaders recognize that no children can be created via such masturbation, and more importantly, the participants in such activity are likely to realize, in time, that it is a Superior way to have sex, resulting in less likelihood of them choosing to have intercourse in the future. I wish to conclude this portion by saying that I fully recognize that the societal position with regard to nurturing, affectionate, long-term relationships between two people, is that if the two people establish an intimate sexual relationship, the non-sexual affection and friendship and closeness that they feel for each other will grow and increase. Most of you brainwashed creatures share this notion. But it is completely invalid and quite nonsensical. Companionship, friendship, affection, are interactive in nature. Sex and love however, are individualistic in nature. An interactive relationship that attempts to build or sustain itself upon either sex or love, is almost certain to fail, or at the very least to prove and to feel highly unsatisfying and inferior to most people. An interactive relationship that is based solely upon companionship, friendship, affection, mutual empathy, etc..., is much more likely to flourish and succeed, because there are no overtly individualistic components that are interfering with the interactive relationship. The beginning of intimate sexual contact, or the initial professions of "romantic love" from one person to the other, often heralds the beginning of the collapse of a positive, nurturing relationship that is based upon companionship, friendship, affection, and mutual empathy, the relationship is ruined, there is destruction of the genuine friendship, affection, empathy, that existed within the relationship at earlier stages, with the introduction of romantic love and sexual intercourse/intimacy to the relationship. This is because both sex and love are individualistic activities, that people must not attach false and invalid idealizations upon. Love is something to be reserved for oneself, as I will brilliantly outline later at this page. Sex is an appropriately selfish, self-centered act, that should revolve around attaining individual physical and emotional pleasure, via the maximization of the sexual arousal ritual. And logic dictates that the individual himself can best achieve such maximum arousal on his own, or he might be able to use professionals who are skilled at providing such arousal, such as those humans who have been given the demonizing label of "prostitute", or he might be able to find a friend, an acquaintance, etc..., who is in tune with and shares/understands his sexual needs. The notion that the person needs to attach both his sex and love needs to a person he feels "great affection" towards, and then vow/promise to only have sex with this one person for a very long time, usually for the rest of his life, is absolutely perverse, unnatural, illogical, harmful, enslaving, and carries absolutely no legitimate benefits or advantages.

The next issue at hand is virginity, and an additional fleshing out of the Truths on sexual abstinence. Society perversely defines virginity as a lack of intimate sexual contact with other human beings, not as a lack of having had sex. Meaning that a person might have had sex thousands of times, had thousands of sexual climaxes, and yet he would still be declared to be a virgin, while another person, who may have only had sex once or twice, and never climaxed, is decreed to have "lost" his virginity, if the first individual engaged in Superior, solo, masturbatory sexual activity, while the second individual engaged in direct, intimate, sexual contact of the intercourse variety, with another person. This renders the definition utterly ridiculous and invalid. The definition of virginity is used to create an artificial and invalid pedestal upon which the few, specific types of sexual activity that society is seeking to promote and impose upon you citizen-slaves, are made to appear superior and preferable. Just as the Superior decision by an individual to choose masturbation over two-person intimate contact sex is relentlessly ridiculed and condemned by society, so to is the choice to be a "virgin". On a completely superficial level, it may appear to you brainwashed creatures that your society approves of virginity, applauds people who are virgins, and encourages people to remain virgins. All three of these theories are completely and utterly false. Actual virginity is condemned by society, only the "atmospheric", abstract notion of virginity is sometimes placed within a positive light by societies and cultures. The actual practice of virginity, the actual choice by any individual to be a virgin, is relentlessly condemned and ridiculed, with the degree of condemnation increasing the older in age the individual becomes. This is because the virgin is violating Sacred Family Unit mythology, in indicating a desire to resist having sex, to resist creating children, and to resist serving as a father or mother to children. Make no mistake folks, virginity is condemned by society, for both men and women, boys and girls, of all ages. Yes, a 13 year old girl virgin will receive somewhat less overt condemnation and ridicule than a 33 year old male virgin. But every child, by the age of ten, already knows that he needs to lose his virginity, and the sooner he does lose his virginity, the sooner he becomes a "mainstream", "normal" member of human society. This is just as true for girls, as it is for boys, although the exact path towards losing virginity that society advocates is somewhat different, being one of overt aggression for boys, and passive acceptance or sly seduction for girls. Society instructs all boys and men that to "deflower a virgin", meaning to have intercourse with a female who has never before had intercourse, is the ultimate sex act, guaranteed to provide the highest degree of sexual pleasure and intensity that exists in the universe. This ridiculous lie is told to all boys and men, because society overtly seeks to rob all girls, women, and men as well, of their virginity. Men are told to target virgins for their sexual overtures, because this guarantees that there will be almost no virgins past 21 years of age, and the maximum number of women who can become mothers, will have been subjected to the loss of virginity, and even more specifically, to the act of sexual intercourse, which directly causes women and girls to become pregnant, be it by desire or by mistake. So, instead of virginity being an honored and coveted character trait, the reality is that virginity is decreed to be perverse, unnatural, harmful to the society at large, and an absolute campaign of mass, genocidal coercion is employed by society, to try and strip all human beings of their virginity at the earliest possible age. Boys and men who might prefer to remain virgins are subjected to even greater societal condemnation than girls and women are. Any boy, of any age, who expresses a desire to not engage in sexual contact with females, or who indicates any interest in remaining a virgin, is subjected to not merely verbal terrorization, but is almost certain to be physically attacked and assaulted by members of his own peer group, such as schoolmates or playmates. These brutal assaults occur with the overt encouragement and advocacy of society itself.

Teens and young adults who want to be virgins are compelled to keep their True Reality personal desire/need a secret, from everyone. The longer they remain virgins, the more obligated they become to keep their virginity secret, because the degree of condemnation and ridicule they will certainly receive, increases with each year that they age, as long as they remain a virgin. Only one small classification of humans are allowed to remain virgins, and this consists of a few types of religious leaders and religious devotees, such as nuns. The perverse societal logic at work here, is that making "sacrifices to god", is the only thing more precious and important than having intercourse and other two-person intimate sexual contact. So, a few god-freak leaders and devotees are allowed to "sacrifice" their societal obligation to have sex, as a form of mass moral atonement for the limitless, mindless, massive amounts of sex that all other citizen-slaves engage in, under the specific direction and auspices of the leaders of their society. This sacrifice is then thrown into the faces of all the citizen-slaves by religious leaders, in an attempt to make them feel superficially guilty for having sex, as well as further accepting perverse societal control and decree regarding how they have sex, whom they have sex with, how often they have sex, etc... Many women who become nuns have no belief in god, much less a desire to "serve" this nonexistent entity. They become nuns because they feel it is the only way they can avoid having intimate sexual contact with other human beings, for the rest of their lives. The only way! What an incredible indictment of your diseased society this is, that even females, who are superficially taught that it's "okay" to "play hard to get" for awhile, have absolutely no chance, on an intellectual or emotional level, to decide to live their lives as virgins. Only one option is provided to them, if they remain committed to making this life path choice, and that option is to become a public, god myth agent and promoter, to literally wear a "scarlet letter", in the form of a nun's uniform, on their bodies, whenever they set foot in public, so that everyone can see that they have been "branded" as being virgins. And of course the vast majority of these women were sexually tortured as children. Society will not acknowledge that to some of it's tortured victim-creations, any type of intimate, sexual contact with another human being, not only would provide no pleasure or satisfaction, but would in fact result in the experience of horrific emotional torture, as a result of the actual torture, sexual torture, that the individual, male or female, was subjected to in the past, almost always beginning during childhood.

A few words now on abstinence, which is somewhat similar to virginity, but still deserves a few comments in it's own right. Sexual abstinence involves a profound, personal decision by an individual, to not engage in most, but not necessarily all, types of sexual activity. Most commonly, an abstainer will choose to not have any type of sexual contact with another human being, but may very well still "have sex", in terms of the most Superior type of sexual activity that exists, masturbation. Although just as many virgins do engage in masturbation, most are simply waiting for what they perceive to be the "right time" to start having what they have deluded into considering to be "real sex", namely intercourse. They have no genuine plans to abstain from having sex for any lengthy period of time, and therefore they do not deserve the label of abstainer. The proper definition for sexual abstainer is: Someone who has made a commitment to refrain from having intimate sexual contact with all other living things, for a lengthy period of time, and intends to honor this commitment despite any "temptations" to break his commitment, that he might run across as time passes. Since your diseased society refuses to define masturbation as "having sex", the person who is choosing to abstain from sex certainly has no obligation to also abstain from masturbation. Just as virginity is condemned and ridiculed by society, so too is sexual abstinence on the part of individuals who are not virgins. However, if an old person, past age 60, chooses to become abstinent, the degree of societal condemnation and ridicule is greatly decreased. Why?? Very simply, the older human, most especially a female, is no longer able to breed, no longer able to create children, and therefore societal leaders are more willing to allow the human to "retire" from the obligation that society imposes upon all human beings, to have sex, to create children, and to pair off into couples for the purpose of legal, cultural, and pseudo-moral enslavement. Even at age 70, a man's decision to become sexually abstinent is met with quite a lot of societal condemnation. But a 70 year old woman who makes this same decision, receives only a little condemnation. This is because many men, even at age 70, can still impregnate women, while at the same time no 70 year old woman can become pregnant.

There are some sexual abstainers who make a conscious, intellectual decision that no other human being on planet earth is worthy of having intimate sexual contact with them. No more than one out of 500,000 adults, at most, makes this decision. But I would like to take this opportunity to publically applaud and salute these brave and Superior individuals, for having adopted this courageous and Superior mindset, and for having lived it out within their own lives. As you will read soon, in my "Personal Comments & Revelations" on sex, I, your Seer of Forbidden Truth, am in fact both an adult virgin and a sexual abstainer, and extremely proud to be able to reveal these personal Truths. But first, a few more points on the attitudes which shape the sexual abstainer. There is nothing inherently arrogant or egotistical in a person choosing to abstain from sex because they feel that no other human on the planet deserves to have intimate sexual contact with them. This is a perfectly healthy, self-empowered, self-valuing attitude to have. There is absolutely no rational reason why anyone should submit or agree to have intimate sexual contact with others, especially given the fact that most people can train and teach themselves to achieve even greater sexual pleasure and release, via solo masturbation. Having sexual contact with other people is dangerous on many different levels, it is unpredictable and uncontrollable, on many levels. It represents compromise and dilution of sexual power and autonomy, rather than the pursuit of ultimate sexual power and control, which is best achieved without the direct interference of any other human. All of these Truths apply equally, for both men and women. Most adult human beings in america and in most "modern and civilized" 21st century societies, have been subjected to sexual abuse and victimization, of one kind or another, be it physical, emotional, or cultural, during their childhoods. It was other human beings who victimized them sexually, with the tacit and overt approval/permission of society itself. For such torture victims to stand up for themselves, claim their sexuality as their own, and vow to abstain from all sexual contact with all human beings, represents the ultimate in courageous embrace of True Reality, and the ultimate expression of proper and appropriate self-love. Amazingly, the "mental health experts" of your societies would instruct and advise these torture victims that they need to "transcend" their childhood sexual torture, by "moving forward" in life and seeking out sexual relationships with other adults, literally attempting to coerce these torture victims into agreeing to mentally relive the torture of intimate sexual contact with other human beings that they have already endured in their lives. How utterly perverse and malevolent! And yet as I have already revealed, mental health professionals/doctors are nothing more than societal prostitutes, obligated to grant legitimacy to all of the perverse and insane doctrines and decrees that the evil society within which they practice, seeks to impose upon them, as well as upon all citizen-slaves. Virginity and sexual abstinence are positive virtues and positive life paths, not because there is any sort of a "moral" claim, based on the insane god myth, that "denying oneself sexual pleasure" is a good thing, but rather because a personal decision to be a virgin, to abstain from sex, to refrain from engaging in sexual contact with other human beings, indicates and represents self-love, self-value, and a refusal on the part of the individual to accept the inferior, culturally coerced sexual ideology that your diseased societies deliberately and viciously impose upon all of their citizen-slaves. It indicates a courageous personal intent to remain safe, and to avoid further victimization at the hands of other human beings. The individuals who make these Superior life choices are worthy of praise, honor, and unconditional support, rather than the absolutely brutal condemnation and ridicule that they are in reality subjected to.

I certainly do not have either the space or the inclination to discuss the many thousands of different ways to have sex that are available, so I will limit myself to some generalized, brief overviews here. Keep in mind folks, that all of you should feel free to send me e-mail if you wish me to elaborate upon any topic, any issue, any specific point or detail within any of the Texts at this website. Assuming that your e-mail is completely respectful and deemed by me to be totally sincere, there is a good chance that your query, if it is a Superior one, will indeed receive a reply, posted at the "feedback/latest updates" page, and possibly even added to the text of the essay itself. Group sex, which involves more than two people engaging in intimate sexual contact while together in the same room, is utterly condemned by your society, given the demonizing label of "orgy". Even though I do absolutely recognize that solo, masturbatory sex generally offers the best way for a majority of people to achieve extreme sexual pleasure, it does not follow that 2 people having intimate sexual contact offers a better method of having sex than 3 people, which is better than 4 people, etc... In other words, while 1 person having sex may be best, 3, 4, 5, 6, 10, 20+ people all having intimate sexual contact together, is certainly not worse than 2 people having sex together. It all depends upon the individual, some people enjoy variety, they enjoy different physical sensations, they enjoy exhibiting their bodies to others. It can increase the degree of sexual pleasure and release that they achieve, although I do feel strongly that in many cases sexually promiscuous individuals are repeating and reliving the sexual torture that other human beings imposed upon them, usually during their childhoods, in their repetitive, promiscuous sexual encounters with other people, as adults. Human beings are taught by society to hate themselves, taught that they deserve to suffer, and this perversely inspires them to "deliberately" make themselves suffer, over and over, throughout their entire lives, in many cases. All this having been said, I want to make it clear that there is absolutely no moral basis with which to negatively judge those who have a great deal of sex with a great many other people, or who choose to participate in group sex. Some people who do this derive great pleasure, genuine sexual pleasure and Superior release of their sexual energy, via such acts, and most of these people are freer than those who blindly embrace fascist societal decree to only have intercourse type sex with a single human being, the same human being, over and over, for many years.

Oral and anal sex are just two of many different types of ways to have sex, which generally only involve two people, just as intercourse involves just two people. But oral and anal sex are condemned by society, not sanctified and encouraged like intercourse is. Why?? Once again we have the issue of child creation at the forefront. Oral and anal sex can and often do provide more physical pleasure to participants, than intercourse does. This terrifies societal leaders, who recognize that intercourse has to be sanctified, because they have a vested interest in creating as many new citizen-slaves, generation after generation, as they possibly can. If most people were to recognize that masturbation, oral sex, anal sex, etc..., provided them with a Superior way to have sex, they would stop having intercourse, or at least greatly reduce how often they have intercourse, and this would cause the number of children created, to plummet. Understand this: The vast majority of all children, are not wanted. Either one or both of the people who created the child, did not want to create a child, when they had sexual intercourse. This is true for teen-agers having sex for the first time, for promiscuous young adults and teens, for engaged/sex restricting couples, and for married couples as well. In all four categories, the exact same Truth is valid: There was no specific intent and desire by both sexual participants to create a child, in a solid majority of all of the sexual acts, by people in all four categories, which resulted in the creation of a child. Societal leaders, despite making utterly false verbal claims that they have a desire to reduce the "unwanted" pregnancy rates, have absolutely no such desire or intent. The exact opposite is true, society seeks to get as many women and girls as possible to become pregnant, and to convince as many men and boys as it can, to impregnate women and girls. This is why the Superior, safer, and generally more physically pleasurable ways to have sex, such as masturbation, oral sex, mutual masturbation involving two or more people at the same time in the same place, etc..., are all relentlessly demonized and condemned by society, while the single and sole method of having sex that carries with it the danger of creating a child, as well as many other dangers and drawbacks, including potentially fatal ones, intercourse, is relentlessly promoted and sanctified to all citizen-slaves, as being the only proper way to have sex.

Going back to the issue of sexual promiscuity, a great many human beings spend years, decades, sometimes their entire lifetime, going from person to person, establishing a brief sexual relationship with them, then "dumping" them and moving on to the next person, over and over and over. Why do they engage in this type of behavior, endangering their own health, safety, and lives, as well as wasting a tremendous amount of time and energy within their limited lifespan?? It is because they are laboring under an invalid, delusional mindset regarding sex and sexuality, that their society has terroristically brainwashed them into embracing. Some of these humans believe that they need to find "romantic love" with another person, even though there is no such type of love within the framework of rational human behavior. So they go from person to person to person, trying to establish a relationship based upon genuine and legitimate romantic love, that cannot be established, because there is no such thing as genuine and legitimate romantic love. Any relationship that tries to build itself upon this invalid concept, cannot possibly stand and remain and endure, because it is like building a house out of a deck of playing cards. There is no foundation within Truth, to such a relationship. Other sexually promiscuous people have been so broken and brainwashed by society, that they cannot love themselves, either intellectually, emotionally, or sexually, and this drives them to develop an obsession with "obtaining" the love of another person, via convincing another person to agree to have sex with them. This has to be one of the greatest tragedies within the deranged landscape of human philosophical perversion. The individual still retains the notion that he "needs to be loved", but has lost all ability to love himself, and therefore is left with no other emotional option beyond desperately attempting to find other people to love him, even though all such love will be flawed, conditional, invalid, and of course nowhere near as pure and untouchable and unconditional as self-love is. "I need to be loved by you, because I am unable to love myself, I also cannot satisfy myself sexually, because the society that I am addicted by and enslaved to has demonized masturbation, so I will go out and seek other humans to have sex with me, and if they agree, this means they love me, and so I will be loved and my sexual needs will be satisfied." This is the utterly perverse, tragic tableau that is being played out by countless millions of human beings each and every day, who have been stripped of two of the most precious, valuable, and irreplaceable human rights and needs in existence, the right and ability to love oneself, and the right and ability to meet and satisfy ones need and desire for sexual pleasure and release.

What about homosexuality and lesbianism? Here we have individuals satisfying each other's sexual needs in an interactive manner, but as always, since we do not have actual intercourse that can create children, homosexuality and lesbianism are viciously and relentlessly condemned and demonized by society. Every man who chooses to satisfy himself sexually with another man, is taking himself out, refusing to accept, the child creating obligation that society is determined to impose upon him. He is also taking his sexual partner out of this perverse obligation. The same is true for every woman who engages in lesbian behavior for the purpose of achieving sexual pleasure/release. She is not allowing a man to impregnate her, while at the same time achieving the sexual pleasure and release that she needs. This absolutely infuriates and terrifies societal leaders, not only because of the individual loss of breeders, but because societal leaders are in constant fear that more and more citizens will discover and realize that intercourse is an extremely poor, incredibly restrictive, inferior way to achieve sexual pleasure and release, and this will result in more and more people refusing to have intercourse, opting instead for more pleasurable and Superior ways to have sex. If homosexuality and lesbianism were not viciously condemned by society, more people would "experiment" with this type of sexual activity, and some of them would realize that on a personal level, it is a Superior way for them to satisfy their sexual needs, when compared to intercourse. The issue of sexual attraction will be discussed very soon, but first let me say that it is a fact that most men find it easier to establish close friendships with other men, than with women. And most women find it easier to establish close friendships with other women, than with men. Individuals of the same gender generally have more things in common, experience things in a more similar manner, and can identify with each other in a more accurate fashion, than individuals of different genders. This stronger intellectual and emotional connection should and would, were it not for perverse societal brainwashing, extend into the arena of sexual pleasure/release, as well. It is clear to me that if homosexuality and lesbianism were not so brutally condemned and demonized by society, many more people would eagerly and happily embrace both of these sexual paths, than is currently the case. Women especially, would flock to each other, savoring the comfort and familiarity and sensitivity that they would find within close friends of their own gender, as they helped each other to satisfy their sexual needs and desires. But no, instead they are terroristically compelled by society to repeatedly go out with strange men, that they usually have established no type of genuine friendship with, for the mystical purpose of trying to find "romantic love", which does not in fact exist within reality. Again, the notion of romantic love is an artificial construct of society, designed to compel men and women to go out with each other, to pair of into couples, to enslave themselves into a family unit, and to create child-slaves, which are used by society as the ultimate, lifetime, enslavement device. Homosexuality and lesbianism is further terrifying to you diseased creatures and your evil societies, because it offers a type of potential equality and mutual, reciprocal identification with self and with one's partner within an intimate, couple relationship, that is contrary to the design structure of societally promoted male/female intercourse.

Sex is marketed by society to you creatures, as a melding of opposites, as well as a power and subjugation play. A man and a woman are supposed to be "attracted" to each other not because they are very similar to each other and share the same physical, emotional, intellectual, and psychological traits, but rather because they are different from each other. The differences are said and taught by society, to serve as enhancements to the relationship, even though this notion is patently ridiculous and irrational when looked at from any Truth-based perspective. This lie results in people deliberately seeking out intimate, sexual relationships, with other people that they share few if any common traits and interests with, creating a recipe for certain failure, as well as frustration which leads to violent abuse and attack upon sex partners. Furthermore, sex is decreed by societal policy to not be an act of affection and benevolence between two individuals, but rather as a tool of subjugation and entrapment, for both men and women, in different ways. I want to focus specifically on intercourse here, although these same Truths can and do apply to most other societally sanctioned forms of sex, that involve two people becoming sexually intimate with each other. Intercourse is a form of "attack", oppression, and subjugation, committed by a male upon a female, even if the male has no specific interest in hurting the woman. In intercourse, the male repeatedly rams a rigid body part directly into a sensitive, vulnerable area of a woman's body, attempting to go as deep as possible, and committing this act in a physically forceful manner. The woman is expected to either lie passively, or to move her body in such a way as to better accommodate the man's efforts. He is imposing himself upon her, in an aggressive, forceful, violent manner. The fact that she might not be "resisting", does not change the reality of the situation. He is physically subjugating the woman, as he has intercourse with her. Society teaches men that no matter how torturous their day to day lives might be, as a result of economic oppression, emotional enslavement, familial obligations, etc..., they retain both the right and the ability to savor the cathartic physical and emotional pleasure of subjugating female human beings, via intercourse and other "couple-based" sexual activities. A wife and a female live-in lover, are essentially told that they are obligated to submit to the sexual demands of their male partners, or face likely "eviction" from the relationship, and loss of the financial/emotional dependency that they likely have built up during the course of the relationship. In addition, if the relationship collapses, they are blamed and condemned by society, under the decree that women have an obligations to keep all Sacred Family Units, once they have been created/established, together. On the flip side, society also allows women to retain the illusion, and in some cases to establish a reality within a sexual relationship, in which the man becomes dependent upon the woman, and she is able to dominate and subjugate him. As is so often the case with sex, the perverse myth of romantic love plays a primary role in many such situations. The man becomes falsely and invalidly convinced, on an emotionalized level, that he "must" establish and maintain a sexual relationship with a specific female, because he delusionally believes that he feels romantic love for her, and not only that, but the romantic love is so powerful and profound that it cannot be achieved with any other woman. Countless millions of men are afflicted with this societally induced mental illness/derangement, to the degree where they not only verbally say, but genuinely believe that there is factual accuracy to thoughts/beliefs such as: "I can't live without you", and "You are my whole life, you are the purpose of my life, the center of my universe," and "Without you I am nothing, without you I might as well be dead," and "We are meant to be together for all of eternity," and "If I can't have you I might as well be dead," and "If I can't have you, nobody will have you." There is not a shred of sanity or legitimacy to any of these thoughts/beliefs, they are artificial constructs that have developed within the brains of men, as a result of three primary things: 1: An inability to love oneself, 2: An addiction to the toxic myth that one needs to be loved by others. 3: An embrace of the ridiculous, societally imposed myth that romantic love exists, is important, must be found, obtained, and clung to at all costs. Yes, it is certainly true that women become afflicted with this exact same series of derangements, towards men, almost as often as men do, towards women. And the genocidally harmful consequences are just as profound, in both cases. What I am pointing out here, very specifically, is how this particular form of perverse societal teaching can and is used to also allow women to make men dependent upon and subjugated to them, within an intimate, couple-based sexual relationship. Of the three systematic human failures listed above, all of which are extremely harmful and completely induced/caused by society itself, item #1, an inability to love oneself, is at the innermost core root of the flower of disease. Only because human beings have been stripped of the ability to properly love themselves, are the other two myths, that romantic love exists and that the person needs to be loved by another person, able to flourish and obtain such an incredibly powerful hold upon the intellectual and emotional mind of the societal torture victim. What we have are women believing that they are dependent upon men for love, men believing that they are dependent upon women for love, and yet the type of love that they believe they need and are obsessed with obtaining from another person, does not even exist as a reality. And these same people are completely unable to feel or use the genuine love that does exist within their minds, because it can only be properly directed towards self, and their society has stripped them of the ability to love themselves! How incredibly perverse this situation is!

Societally promoted sex involves the creation of a needy, dependent relationship, for as many citizen-slaves as possible, which is based upon nothing but self-hatred. "I need somebody else to agree to have sex with me, because this will mitigate and relieve the self-loathing that I feel for myself, due to a complete inability to love myself." This is the perverse attitude of 99.9% of all adult and late teen-age human beings, within ultra-diseased societies like america. Of course this Truth is rarely embraced or even recognized, on an overtly conscious level, but it is the factually accurate heart and soul of all mainstream, modern sexuality. Society strips the individual of the precious and irreplaceable ability to love himself, replacing this with an utterly toxic message that the individual needs to establish intimate relationships with other people, to "obtain" love from them, as an invalid way to emotionally cope with the loss of all ability to love himself, that he has been torturously and unforgivably stripped of, as a direct result of chosen, core societal policy and ideology. Societally promoted, couple-based sex, is oppressive, this is a universal Truth, no matter how much "pleasure" it might superficially provide to some individuals. It is oppressive because it is based upon a false and invalid concept, romantic love, which does nothing but addict people to each other, causing them to invalidly adopt the pretense that they are getting their emotional needs met because they are able to "love other people and to be loved by other people", when the reality is that neither the love they believe they feel for others, nor the love that they believe others feel for them, is valid, true, or accurate, and they have lost the only genuine, the only valid, the only important type of love that exists, the ability to love themselves. Sex is used by human beings to try to cope with the horrors, terrors, and unbearable aspects of their real, day to day, lives. Men who are complete societal slaves, addicted to horrific substances and insane myths,, enchained to horrific jobs and bosses, find comfort in sex, by inflicting pain, dominance, oppression, and subjugation, upon women, in couple-based sex that society advocates, such as intercourse and oral sex, finding comfort in the false belief that they are loved, even though they cannot love themselves. And in the process, they do nothing but enslave and enchain themselves further, as the noose of Sacred Family Unit mythology and the legal consequences of getting married and creating children, are tightened around their necks. Women who have been told and taught since birth that they are inferior to men, that it is their sacred duty to find and convince a man to agree to have sex with them, preferably on an exclusive basis, are usually even less able to conceive of the notion of genuinely loving themselves than men are, and obsessively begin, usually by the age of 10, before they even reach puberty, to use the "weapon" of their sexual attractiveness, another artificial construct of society, to lure boys and men to them, obsessively demanding that the boys and men "love" them, once again because they have been stripped of the natural, instinctual ability to love themselves. This is the utterly toxic web that has been woven by your evil societies, around the specific issue of "proper sex" and "romantic love". Both men and women use each other sexually, to try and feel better about themselves, specifically because they are unable to love themselves, unable to feel good about themselves, unable to value and love themselves. The woman feels unattractive, inferior, worthless, so she sets out to find a man willing to have sex with her. The man that she finds feels like a failure, a slave, he hates himself as he recognizes on an intellectual and emotional level, the pointlessness and worthlessness and victimization that is his life. He sets out to find a woman to have sex with him, so that he can feel better about himself and his life. The two people who tragically have been stripped of the ability to love themselves meet, have sex, and desperately embrace the ridiculous premise that they "love" each other, even though the reality is that neither person is able to love himself, and the specific reason they set out to find someone else to have sex with, is because they hate and loathe themselves so much, usually on a subconscious level, that they cannot emotionally or intellectually justify giving themselves the sexual pleasure/release that they wanted/needed!

All societally promoted, couple-based sex is either violent, exploitative, lie-based, or manipulative in nature, most often all four of these negative realities rolled into one. Sex is used by societal torture victims, to hurt and harm other societal torture victims, as standard societal policy. Men demand sex from women, while women withhold sex from men, in threatening ways, teasing manners, as a ridiculous game and as a power trip. Women are told to play "hard to get" when men demand sex from them, as a way to provide an illusion of false control and power to women, even as they continue to be viciously victimized by all mainstream societal policies regarding the issue of sex. Men are told that when a woman turns down a man's request/demand for sex, she is simply playing "hard to get", as she has been instructed to do by society, she is simply teasing the man, while in reality she wants to have sex with him. This is done to stroke and massage the ego of the tortured, self-hating man, and of course it can only lead to the obsessive, unrelenting, violent, rape-based, sometimes homicidal sexual obsessions that men develop towards women, and causes the epidemic of sex "crimes" which are pervasive within all modern, ultra-diseased societies like america. Both genders are instructed by society to use their "sexuality" as a weapon, as well as a tool to get their own sexual needs met, by other people. Needs that could and should be easily met by people on their own, if only they were raised up within a sane, properly nurturing, Truth-based society. Sex "crimes" are nothing more than rational projections of the insane sexual ideologies that society malevolently imposes upon it's citizen-slaves. If society teaches that sex is a weapon, that sex is to be used to exploit and victimize people, that all people need to have sex with other people, that all women want to have sex, that when a woman refuses to have sex with someone, she is simply playing hard to get, all of these ideologies are absolutely taught and imposed as facts upon you citizen-slaves, then of course there will be an epidemic of brutal sex crime, much of which is not even recognized or treated as such, by your diseased societies. For example, literally millions of wives in america are raped every week, either physically, emotionally, or intellectually terrorized into having intimate sexual contact with their husbands, that they do not want to have. That is the definition of rape! And yet under insane Sacred Family Unit mythology, it is decreed that married women are supposed to have sex with their husbands, are obligated to have sex with their husbands, and so these millions of rapes are never classified as rapes, or crimes of any kind, even though they often involve far greater personal distress and terrorization, on a far more enduring, ongoing level, than any rape by a complete stranger upon a woman he had never before seen and has no "relationship" with, may cause.

Another extremely interesting form of sex that needs to be explored, is fetishism. What is fetishism? The general definition which is applicable here, with regard to sex, is: The displacement of sexual arousal or gratification to a fetish. And the word fetish is defined thusly: Something, such as a material object or a nonsexual part of the body, that arouses sexual desire and may become necessary for sexual gratification. An abnormally obsessive preoccupation or attachment; a fixation. Okay, lets look at these two definitions. Society says that fetishism is a displacement of sexual arousal or gratification. What does this mean? It means that your fascist, lie-based, deranged society has taken it upon itself to impose rules and regulations upon all citizen-slaves, as to what "should" provide the citizen-slaves with sexual arousal and/or gratification. If any human does not follow these rules and regulations, they are declared to be abnormal and given a demonizing label of fetishist, which is the word that a person "afflicted" with fetishism is dubbed. The reality of course, is that every type of sexual arousal and every type of sexual gratification that is sought/claimed, is equally valid, dependent solely upon the unique True Reality of every human being. There is no genuine "displacement" that can occur, and if anything, the lifetime of brainwashing and coercion that society commits upon each person, attempting to get the person to agree to solely embrace and engage in couple-based, intercourse-focused, gender-specific sexual activity, is the only type of genuine, mass "displacement" of individual, unique, sexual development and interest, outside of the modest instinctual desire to procreate, that can and does occur. Being sexually aroused/obsessed by inanimate objects like shoes, lingerie, guns, etc..., or being sexually aroused/obsessed by so-called "non-sexual" body parts such as feet, fingernails, hair, etc..., is not a "displacement" of anything. A person's sexual obsessions are shaped and directed by the sum total of their life experiences, combined with the malicious brainwashing and fascist thought control that their society imposes upon them. A fetishist who is obsessed with women's feet is decreed by society to be "displacing" his sexual arousal and gratification, solely because the society has decided that it wants it's citizen-slaves to engage in sexual intercourse when they become sexually aroused and need sexual gratification. Therefore, the foot fetish and the fetishist-practitioner is demonized, even as the "intercourse fetish" has been and continues to be pervasively and brutally imposed upon all citizen-slaves, as being the "right" way to have sex. The fetishist who is attracted to inanimate objects receives a slightly greater degree of societal scorn and condemnation than the fetishist who is attracted to an "inappropriate" body part, using the rationale that the body part fetishist is at least a bit more likely to seek out some direct sex-related contact with other human beings, while the shoe, lingerie, gun sexual fetishist is more likely to be able and to choose to meet his own sexual needs without having much if any direct contact with other human beings. Understand this, folks: Even though two-person, intercourse sex is by far the most strongly promoted, society has a whole, huge other set of standards as to judging how acceptable other ways of having sex are. Oral sex meets with quite a bit of approval, since it usually involves two people and can lead up to or offer a break from intercourse sex, without causing the specific, two-person sexual relationship to be broken. But oral sex between two people of the same gender, is a different story, and receives much more societal condemnation, because the "relationship" between the two people cannot result in the creation of a child, and it potentially removers two breeders from the societal pool. The greatest degree of societal condemnation is reserved for people who are able and choose to meet their own sexual needs, and have no interest in having any type of sexual contact with other people, because these individuals terrify societal leaders. A person who is sexually free, independent, loves himself, refuses to addict, enmesh, and enslave himself within any type of a sexual relationship with another person, strikes terror into the very core of the societal leadership, because the entire goal of society is to break each individual, to strip them of all self-love, to strip them of all genuine personal autonomy, to make the individual dependent upon and addicted to, other human beings and perverse societal doctrine as a whole. So, a fetishist who has a strict sexual obsession towards shoes, is demonized slightly more than a fetishist who has a strict sexual obsession towards human feet, because it is assumed that the foot fetishist is more likely to at least engage in regular, sexual-type physical contact with other human beings, in order to get his sexual needs met, thus creating a situation in which a dependent relationship that erodes self-love and personal autonomy, is more likely to develop, than is the case with a strict shoe fetishist, who is only interested sexually, in the inanimate object.

It is clear to any sane thinker that the societal sexualization of certain body parts, is nothing more than an artificial, invalid construct, that certainly cannot be legitimately imposed upon all citizen-slaves, as constituting "proper placement" of individual sexual interest. 21st century american society chooses to sexualize women's breasts. A specific message is given by society, to all citizen-slaves, that breasts are supposed to be a highly sexual, erogenous body part. Men are told, trained, and coerced, under the threat of being labeled "abnormal", to see and perceive female breasts as being sexy. Women are told, taught, and coerced into agreeing to use their breasts as objects of sexual enticement, to wear bras which accentuate the breast, to wear clothing which exposes a portion of the breast, etc... This is nothing more than the societal sexualization of a body part, and there is nothing "normal" about it. The fact that a strong majority of citizen-slaves do embrace breasts as a sexual body part, only indicates and demonstrates how pathetically gullible and easily manipulated, lacking all independent thinking and reasoning skills, most people are. I'm not saying there is anything terribly wrong, on an individual basis, with a person being sexually obsessed with women's breasts. What I am saying is that it is absolutely outrageous for the breast fetishist to think that he is "more normal" than the foot fetishist, or for the breast fetishist to adopt an air of superiority, based upon the notion that he is directing his sexual interests properly, while the foot fetishist is doing so improperly, "displacing" his sexual interests, as the official, primary societal definition of fetishism, has the audacity to proclaim. As to other overtly sexualized body parts, such as the penis and vagina, it is obvious that society chooses to sexualize these parts because they are the body parts that need to be used, when having intercourse. By sexualizing these body parts, the overall goal of getting citizen-slaves to use these body parts, and to allow them to be used in the sexual act of intercourse, is met. As to the societal definition of fetishist: "An abnormally obsessive preoccupation or attachment" concerning sexual arousal and climax, this exact definition is applicable to intercourse, as well. Most devotees of intercourse have an obsession/fixation/preoccupation with engaging in intercourse. To say that this is normal, simply because a great many people are obsessed with intercourse, while significantly fewer people are obsessed with women's feet, and to attach a demonizing label of fetishist to the latter group, is completely hypocritical and disingenuous. Most especially because the continuing high degree of popularity of intercourse is due solely to relentless societal promotion and illegitimate imposition of this one particular sex act, above all others. There is not a shred of legitimate evidence or reason to believe that the person who is married and has regular sexual intercourse with his wife, enjoys a quality or appreciation for life that is better than the person who has never had sexual intercourse with anyone, has never had sexual contact with anyone, and only has sex by himself, while fondling a woman's shoe. Is it possible that the married intercourser derives more pleasure, sexual and otherwise, via his life path? Yes. Is it equally possible that the obsessive shoe fondler derives more pleasure, sexual and otherwise? Yes. Each individual experiences and interprets pleasure, as well as sexuality, in their own, totally unique way. Every person's sexual interests and focus should legitimately be shaped by the sum total of their own unique, True Reality life experiences. For any society to promote one form of sex as being better, more normal, more appropriate, much less to actively demonize, condemn, and ridicule other forms of sex, as all societies do, is completely perverse and outrageous. It is brutally harmful to a majority of people, resulting in them altering their sexual behaviors, hiding their sexual interests, and/or being subjected to traumatic, injurious, sometimes even fatal attack, be it verbal, emotional, or physical, at the hands of enraged, bloodthirsty devotees of mainstream societal ideology on sex, who seize upon the societal opportunity and sanction to assault an openly gay man, for example, with just as much gusto as the serial killer seizes upon societal encouragement to target prostitutes and other officially decreed "inferior and abnormal" classes/groups of people. Most fetishists engage in behaviors that are much safer than sexual intercourse, carry the absolute ability to produce more personal physical and emotional pleasure than intercourse, and there is absolutely no moral or cultural legitimacy to the overt societal decree that intercourse-based sex is better or more appropriate, on any level.

That society overtly promotes the demonization and condemnation of all citizen-slaves who refuse to tow the fascist party line regarding appropriate ways to have sex, is undeniable. For boys in 21st century america, the very first overt curse word that most of them learn, by age 5, 6, 7, 8, is a derogatory term for homosexuals, a three or six letter word beginning with the letter f. I do not even need to write the word out here, because every English speaking person reading this page, man or woman, immediately knows which "F" word I am referring to, as soon as I mention the 3 or 6 letter nature of the word. Your society teaches every child, by the age of eight at the latest, this 3 and 6 letter F word. Amazingly, the child usually has no knowledge of human sexuality at this point, the child cannot define this F word with any type of accuracy, and yet the child is already using the word to demonize and condemn other children, any child who shows the slightest tendency to deviate from the fascist societal decrees as to how the child must act. "You're a f__", says the 5, 6, 7, 8, year old child. "You're a f_____", he says to his crying classmate or playmate. The fact that he cannot define this word is irrelevant. He doesn't need to know the definition, society has already taught him everything he needs to know, that "f__s" are perverse, diseased, inferior creatures, and the best way to insult any other child who shows any type of weakness, sensitivity, compassion, or emotion, is to call them a f__. Amazingly, the tiniest display of physical difference results in the f__ label being applied. If a boy walks in an awkward manner, for example, perhaps waving his arms in a slightly different way than most other boys, he is decreed to be a f__. This is how incredibly intense and pervasive the degree of sexual fascism that is imposed upon you creatures, from birth onward, by your societies, truly is. A child aged 7, who knows virtually nothing about sex, has already been trained to carefully conform his own behavior to that which has been labeled "normal", to carefully observe other children, to note even the tiniest, most obscure type of non-conformity that the other children might reveal, and then to overtly, proudly, openly condemn that child, by calling him a f____. The child doesn't even know what homosexuality is, he doesn't even know what his own sexual interests are! But he knows that his society wants him to conform his behavior to it's fascist decrees of normality, and to publically condemn any other child who fails to conform their behavior. The only way that any child could reach this conclusion and realization, without even knowing the accurate definition of the word that he is using as a tool of demonization, would be because it is one of society's core, most intense and pervasively direct, advocated messages, the society that the child is born into and raised up within. There is plenty of time to find out the exact definition, often the child does not intellectually form a complete understanding of what homosexuality is until he is 14, 15, 17 years old. But by age 5-8, a full decade earlier, the child is already using the 3 and 6 letter f word, upon the instruction of society, to condemn, ridicule, and demonize any other child who shows the slightest hint of deviation from the fascist behavioral agenda that society maliciously attempts to impose upon every child and adult.

Now, lets consider yet another utterly ridiculous societal angle to sex, which I have touched upon already. Bizarrely, when it comes to picking sexual partners, society instructs you creatures that lack of experience is superior to experience. In fact, a complete lack of experience on the part of your sexual partner, the partner being a virgin, will provide ideal sex, while choosing a sexual partner who has a great deal of experience, such as a prostitute or admitted afficionado of sex who has had a great many sexual partners, represents a major drawback that reflects badly upon you. This is a bizarre notion. Consider: Who is more likely to shoot a gun in a superior manner, someone who has never before fired a gun in their lifetime, or someone who has fired 100,000 shots? Who is more likely to be able to throw a ball into a basket, someone who has never played basketball in their life, or someone who has taken 100,000 shots at the basket? Who is more likely able to fix a broken toilet, a person who has never fixed any broken toilet in his life, or a person who has already fixed thousands of broken toilets?? Would you rather have as your pilot a person who has never before flown an airplane, or a person who has piloted thousands of aircraft?? The answer to all these questions is glaringly, undeniably obvious, and the exact same Truth applies to the issue of sex, despite the fact that a few minor wrinkles, such as the possibility of a communicable disease being more likely in a person who has had a huge number of sexual partners, do exist. Taking these wrinkles into account, there is still absolutely no legitimacy to the notion that lack of experience trumps experience, in the choice of a sexual partner. The societal decree that sex with a virgin offers the "best" type of sex, proves that sex is marketed to men by society, as being an act of pure power, dominance, oppression, and victimization. Men and boys are instructed by society to seek out virgins, and to rob them of their virginity, and if they do exactly this, their accomplishment is celebrated and extolled by society, as indicating and demonstrating their superiority. To a slightly lesser but still absolutely valid degree, this applies to women and girls enticing and seducing boys and men who are virgins, as well. The virgin who has never had sex before is inexperienced, scared, nervous, worried. By sex, I am referring here to a two-person, intimate contact type of sex. The only benefits that having sex with a virgin provides to the non-virgin partner, are the ability to emotionally and intellectually exploit and revel in the fear, vulnerability, and "innocence" of the virgin, while massaging the ego by focusing upon the notion that you are the "first" person to "break the innocence" of the virgin, and provide the virgin with the ultimate in sexual pleasure for the very first time. Of course there is no legitimacy to the idea that intercourse-type sex provides any greater pleasure than solo masturbation does, but facts and Truth have never been of any interest or importance to you creatures or your societies.

If the goal of having sex was a benevolent one, of two people each meeting their sexual needs while helping the other person, sexual experience would be prized, not a lack of sexual experience. People would want to have sex with other people who have had a great many sexual encounters with a great many people, recognizing that such a person is far more likely to have developed techniques and skills that the person can use to maximize sexual pleasure and satisfaction for both himself and his sexual partner. But no, instead sex with a virgin is prized, and those who choose to have sex with prostitutes or "loose" women, "gigolo" men, have societal scorn heaped upon them, as is the case with the actual "loose" women and "gigolo" men themselves. This is because mainstream sex, as marketed by society to you, the citizen-slaves, is not benevolent, but rather malevolent. It is utterly selfish, abusive. It is based upon one individual imposing his, or her, will, upon the other person. It is based upon one person feeling good, not by helping another person enjoy sex, but by selfishly satisfying his suppressed rage, hate, frustration, self-hatred, sense of personal impotence in day to day life, by using the other person as an object, to relieve these negative feelings within himself. Deflower the virgin, and you have achieved a victory, you have imposed yourself upon another person, you have hurt them, you have caused them pain and robbed them of the innocence than you once had. Sexual intercourse is in fact marketed and used by society as an act of vengeance, to provide a legal way to hurt and claim vengeance against other human beings, even as the ridiculous and false illusion of "romantic love" being at play, is maintained. The fact that unlike the vast majority of sex acts, intercourse-based sex often involves physical pain being caused to one of the two participants, usually the female, adds to the vengeance factor. It provides a legal way for people to hurt each other, to make themselves feel better by hurting another person, physically, emotionally, psychologically. The same is true for oral sex, of course. In oral sex, the physical pain may be less pervasive, but the psychological degree of utter humiliation and self-loathing experienced by one half of the duo, and the arrogant, sadistic degree of domination and empowerment experienced by the other half, is generally even more pervasive and enhanced, than is the case with intercourse. Within any sane society, virgins and the sexually inexperienced would experiment and explore their sexuality options among themselves, while the sexually experienced crowd would help each other to achieve ever greater heights of pleasure, via technique and methodology advice sharing. The notion that deflowering a virgin somehow represents the ultimate in sexual victory would be recognized as being a perverse illustration of all the wrong and invalid reasons to have sex with others: oppression, terrorization, causing pain, imposition, theft of innocence, and the like.

Sadism and masochism are officially decreed by society to be expressions of sexuality, unusual sexuality, but still sexuality, as opposed to personal rage, hate, or mental dysfunction. The Truth is that a sadist is emotionally enraged, not sexually enraged. A masochist is emotionally self-hating, not sexually self-hating. In both cases, sadists and masochists do express their emotions via sexual activity and obsession. The sadist seeks to cathartically relieve his emotional rage, by expressing that rage upon a fellow human being, in some cases a human being that he feels otherwise sexually attracted to, but in other cases it is the infliction of terrorization, threat, and harm, either real or play-acted, which is in and of itself, the primary sexual "attraction". Remember, a human beings sexual interests and obsessions are limited only by the parameters of his own unique and individual mind. Masochists emotionally hate themselves, but often lack the initiative required to actively harm themselves. They transfer their emotional True Reality of self-loathing and self-victimization, onto a sexual level, and seek out fellow humans to inflict upon them, the personal victimization that they feel they deserve. The issue of whether sadists and masochists suffer from mental dysfunction, is rather moot. Your entire social, cultural, ideological, and governmental systems operate upon utterly deranged principles and mandates. Naturally almost all children brought up within this noxious, diseased atmosphere, will develop significant mental dysfunction, and sadists/masochists fit into this category. The interesting thing is that by choosing to channel their emotional rage, hate, self-loathing, into a sexual focus, many sadists and masochists are able to avoid engaging in activities that could potentially carry much more severely negative personal consequences. For example, the sexual sadist is often completely capable of murdering fellow human beings, and sometimes does actually carry his sadistic rage forward to homicidal effect, either against sexual partners or in other arenas. But more often than not, the sexual sadist does seem to be able to relieve his rage upon sexual partners, without killing them outright. In an ideal situation, the sadist will actually find a masochist to express his sadistic rage upon, thus avoiding the possibility of legal/judicial problems that would more likely occur if his sexual partner was not desirous of having suffering/pain inflicted upon him. Another example, involving the masochist, would be the fact that many people who hate themselves will directly inflict tremendous harm and even death upon themselves, with no sexual component involved, such mentally ill torture victims will needlessly risk/endanger their lives by consuming drugs, skydiving, and overtly attempting to commit "suicide", while many sexual masochists are able to channel most of their self-hating emotions into their sexual encounters, which of course can prove quite harmful and even fatal in and of themselves, if they happen to run across a sadist who is actively homicidal. There are no hard and fast rules regarding the limitation of sadism or masochism to sexual conduct, of course. Some sexual masochists will also viciously abuse/harm themselves in other, totally non-sexual ways. Some sadists will compartmentalize their rage in such a way that they have "legal" sexually sadistic contact with humans, but also commit illegal attacks/assaults upon other humans. The bottom line is that the arena of sex does provide opportunities for both sadists and masochists to satisfy their rage, hate, and self-loathing, in a societally legalized and legitimized fashion. Understand that societal leaders recognize that a tremendous amount of rage, hate, and self-loathing afflicts a tremendous percentage of the population, as a result of the universal abuse and torture that society inflicts upon all children. The societal goal is to provide outlets and coping mechanisms for as many citizen-slaves as possible, in order to maintain them as economically productive, breeding, taxpaying citizens. So just like all different types of brain chemistry altering drugs are made available for this malevolent societal goal, sexual sadism and masochism are also overtly legitimized, in the hope that the torture victims will be able to release and relieve some of their rage, hate, self-loathing, in a way that involves some degree of role-playing/acting, and even mutual consent, such as a sadist hooking up with a masochist. Societal leaders hope that the release of rage/hate/self-loathing via a sexual focus and activity, will dissipate these emotions to the degree where the torture victims are able to continue to function as productive citizen-slaves in their "regular", non-sexual lives. To conclude, sadism and masochism are not sexual activities, to label these actions as constituting sexual activity, is extremely misleading. It is far more accurate to say that sadists and masochists are individual torture victim-creations of society who are filled with rage, hate, and self-loathing, they are able to choose to express their True Reality in many different ways, and sometimes choose to do so in sexual ways, to channel their negative emotions into a relatively safe, in some cases, sexual focus and energy.

This brings us to the issue of prostitution, which I have already touched upon in my Crime essay, so I will try to keep my comments brief. Prostitution can certainly be very harmful to many of the people who choose to engage in this activity as a profession. Most prostitutes are tortured victims of childhood sexual abuse, who hate themselves. But the primary reason why prostitution is sometimes harmful to prostitutes, is because it is relentlessly demonized by society, and people who hate themselves, who want to harm themselves emotionally and/or physically, are thus encouraged to become prostitutes, while at the same time patrons of prostitutes are encouraged to take out all of their rage, hate, frustration, and other negative personal emotions and True Reality feelings, upon prostitutes. Prostitutes are a demonized class of human beings. It is the overt goal and intent of society, to foster, encourage, and enable the victimization of prostitutes, by their patrons. This Truth having been revealed, we also must recognize that some prostitutes absolutely revel in their chosen profession. Some enjoy having sex, and to be able to make a good deal of money while engaging in a physically and emotionally pleasurable activity, is a rare and precious gift, within the brutally enslaving economic structure of modern societies. The notion that all prostitutes hate themselves, or were seriously abused as children, is not valid. Most were abused as children, but this applies to all classes of individuals within an ultra-diseased society like america. Most have negative feelings towards themselves, on a conscious or subconscious level, but again, this is true for the "general public" as well. The fact is, prostitution is a business enterprise, it has employees, prostitutes, and most employees in general do not like/enjoy their jobs, and are exploited and victimized within their job situation, regardless of the profession that they are in. Just as is the case with regular jobs, the self-employed prostitute, the free agent working for himself, who has no "pimp", is less likely to perceive their profession as being brutally oppressive, than the prostitute who has a "boss", who takes a cut of the earnings and imposes rules and demands upon his employee, the prostitute. However, the true enemy of prostitutes is not the pimp, and not their customers, but society itself. A handful of Superior societies have legalized prostitution to some degree, in recent decades, but the vast majority of all societies have not and will not in any way, legally sanction this perfectly harmless and incredibly useful type of sexual contact. It is utterly outrageous that any society would place any type of moral stigma, much less a legal decree of criminality, upon either prostitutes or their customers. The selling of sexual contact provides enormous benefits to customers, and significant benefits to prostitutes themselves. The notion that prostitution can be anything but a completely legal business transaction, is ludicrous. For capitalistic societies like america to specifically criminalize prostitution, represents the ultimate in hypocrisy. Everything is supposed to be for sale in capitalistic societies, the free market system is worshipped as a pseudo-god, and yet in a completely arbitrary, irrationally discriminatory manner, adult human beings are prohibited from having sex with other adult human beings, for money, even though both parties are adult, both parties are mentally competent, both parties agree on the price and on the exact services that are to be rendered in exchange for the money. This is the very definition of a proper, legal, societally encouraged business transaction, and yet simply because sexual interactivity is involved, society insanely declares the acts of offering sexual services for money, as well as accepting sexual services in exchange for money, to be a criminal offense. Outrageous! The reality is, a majority of women get married to men, because they want to gain access to the man's money. Many married women hate their husbands, don't want to have sex with their husbands, but do so, solely because they fear losing access to his money. Other married women specifically choose to have children with a man, because they know that the legal system of their society will reward them with money, should they leave the man or divorce him. Same is true for single women, they have sex with a man because they know that #1: They can get money from society itself, and #2: they can demand money from the man, in the form of "child support". Women sexually pursue wealthy men, because they want money. Men do the same with wealthy women. This is standard operating procedure within your diseased societies. How dare any society attach any type of negative label to prostitutes or their patrons, when the reality is that these people are being much more honest, more up-front, in simply revealing the Truth that an exchange of money, or the pursuit of money, is one of the core motivational roots of a majority of all sexual relationships.

Prostitutes should be praised for their honesty, as should their customers, on all levels, moral, legal, cultural. The prostitute is performing a vital public service, he is helping other human beings to achieve sexual pleasure and climax. The notion that the prostitute might not deserve or be legally entitled to receive monetary payment for performing this service, is just as ludicrous as the notion that a medical doctor, dentist, fireman, garbage man, etc..., does not deserve to be paid for the vital public services that they perform. Your societies have brainwashed you creatures into believing that you need to have intimate sexual contact with other human beings. At the same time, you have created an environment in which a huge majority of people cannot find anyone willing to have sex with them, or cannot find anyone who meets their societally induced perception of a "proper lover", to have sex with them. Masturbation is not a good option, due to societal demonization of this Superior form of sex. This leaves us with millions of people, mostly men, who cannot satisfy their sexual needs. Prostitutes serve this population, performing the vital public service of helping these men to have sex. It is the fault of society that these men cannot bear to embrace the pleasures of masturbation, the same society which insanely demonizes and criminalizes prostitution! Most patrons of prostitutes are men, not women. Why is this?? Think, you brainwashed fools! It is because most women can easily get themselves "raped", they can get other people to have sex with them at will, with no need to pay any money. All the woman has to do is walk into a bar or club, start "flirting", offering her body in a sexually suggestive way to men, and sooner or later, usually sooner, a man, a complete stranger, will offer, sometimes even demand, that the woman engage in intimate sexual contact with him. Or, she could become a prostitute herself, taking money from others, and guaranteeing herself the ability to have sex with a man at will, albeit at some legal risk. This is why 99.9999% of all patrons of prostitutes, are male. Women are just as perversely obsessed with getting other human beings to engage in intimate sexual contact with them, but due to the misogynistic cultural climate of america and most other societies, a woman can always find a man eager to impose his sexual will upon her, for no charge, while many men are not able to find women willing to "give it away for free". Men have just as great a societally induced need for intimate sexual contact with other living things, as women do. But the man cannot find a woman willing to have sex with him for free, unless he is either rich, handsome, charming, willing to go out on "dates" with the woman beforehand, etc... So naturally prostitutes are needed, they are necessary, they perform an incredibly valuable, difficult and dangerous public service, and they deserve to receive the ultimate in societal praise, respect, honor, gratitude, and protection.

The public service that prostitutes perform is very bit as vital and benevolent as that performed by emergency room nurses, public hospital physicians, firemen, etc... The government itself subsidizes vital public services, in most societies. Public hospitals receive governmental funding and support. Fire and police agencies receive financial support from societal leaders, via money that is legally stolen from citizen-slaves, via a "taxation" system, in most societies. If this is to occur, within any society attempting to reform itself, not only would prostitution be declared 100% legal, it would also receive governmental funding, in recognition of the fact that prostitutes are performing and delivering any absolutely vital public service, that is completely benevolent and benign in nature. Just as there are currently "public" hospitals as well as "private" hospitals, there would be a system of governmental support and aid, that prostitutes would be able to take advantage of, in order to better their own lives, increase their safety, and be able to better, more easily serve the needs of their clients. For example, prostitution is an extremely dangerous profession, mainly because society itself demonizes all prostitutes and instructs it's enraged citizen-slaves to specifically target and single out prostitutes for violent attack and brutalization, if they feel compelled to commit any type of a violent attack upon any human being. But in addition to this outrageous example of societal malevolence, the fact is that when a person deliberately goes off with complete strangers to private, isolated locations, thousands and thousands of times, the odds obviously increase that at some point, the prostitute will find himself with a person who desires to hurt, very possibly kill him. Legalizing all prostitution, as well as removing all moral/cultural stigma from being a prostitute, would provide a small degree of added safety for prostitutes, in that they would have no need to fear the police, no need to hide from the police, no need to keep their profession a secret from anyone, and no need to go off to isolated locations in order to have sex with customers. But this is not enough, society owes these sexual saints a lot more than mere legalization of their sexual activities. It must recognize that just as police are given certain special personal safeguards, such as the right to carry guns, wear bulletproof vests, have constant radio contact with a live central station command headquarters, prostitutes deserve to receive special personal safeguards from society, beyond that which members of the "regular public" receive. This is because prostitutes are at higher risk, and they are performing an absolutely vital public service. I would propose that the government establish kiosks where prostitutes could solicit business, with each kiosk specially outfitted with security cameras and license plate recording devices, so that there would be a traceable link to every customer who chooses to patronize prostitutes at these kiosks. Sure, it's possible that some customers bent on hurting or killing prostitutes would wear a physical disguise, other might steal a car so that the license plate could not be traced to them. But establishing such kiosks would demonstrate a proper intent by society to do it's best to provide as much protection to prostitutes, as it possibly can. An even better idea, would be to create "hotels", located close to the kiosks, and provide prostitutes with extremely attractive daily, weekly, monthly rental rates, encouraging them to take their clients to these hotels, for the sexual encounters. Each of these special "prostitute hotels" would have a constant, 24 hour a day, heavy police presence, each room would be equipped with security devices, such as emergency panic alarm buttons. All entrances and exits to the building would be under 24 hour closed-circuit video surveillance and recording. These would be reasonable, appropriate security measures that a sane society would implement, to try and give prostitutes, who are performing a completely benevolent and vital public service, the opportunity to enjoy a level of safety within their day to day working environment, that is similar to that enjoyed by most other people at their jobs. Because prostitution will have been legalized, and all moral stigma removed from both being a prostitute and from patronizing prostitutes, customers who intend no harm would feel no need to be secretive, no need to avoid the surveillance, and in fact many of them would appreciate the security measures as well, since the prostitute would find it more difficult to steal from the client, to rip him off, and the threat of any pimp involvement/interference would be virtually nil. Everyone would benefit, the prostitutes, their customers, and the society as a whole, via both the legalization of prostitution, and the creation of very specific security measures such as I have outlined above, which could be used to provide a maximum degree of safety to all parties involved in these business transactions. Note my use of the word could, above. I certainly would not support any proposal that would require prostitutes to only solicit or accept business in specific areas or locations, such as these kiosks, and the notion of legally restricting the locations where prostitutes can have sex with customers, is even more outrageous and unacceptable. No, if prostitutes do not wish to take advantage of these security measures, they must be completely free to engage in their business in whatever manner they wish. At the same time, society should be obligated to offer and provide these personal safeguards to all prostitutes, so that they have an equal, absolute opportunity to take advantage of them. The Superior, self-loving prostitutes would take advantage of these valuable security benefits, while sadly, there are tortured, self-hating prostitutes, severely tortured victim-creations of your societies, who are literally bent upon committing suicide one way or another, and will shun all offers of enhanced security. That is life, tragedies will occur, it is impossible for a society to save all of it's torture victims, but as the same time it has an absolute obligation to go to all reasonable efforts to provide restitution, atonement, and equal protection to all. The personal danger risk that prostitutes as a group face, is not equal to that of ordinary job holders, it is equal and exceeds that of the policeman, the fireman, the emergency room nurse, while at the same time the public service being performed by the prostitute is just as benevolent, just as benign, and in a sane society, just as legal. Therefore, the prostitute absolutely deserves to be given the opportunity to take advantage of special safeguards that have been designed and implemented on his behalf.

Some of you diseased creatures labor under the delusion that prostitution is bad because it "breaks up families", because it "causes men to stray from their wives." Well, I have to shake my head in amazement, even as I do intellectually recognize how and why your addictions to Sacred Family Unit mythology, as well as the Marriage Myth, cause you to adopt such deranged beliefs. The reality is, families are artificial constructs of society. Men are legally enslaved to women, women are legally enslaved to men, children are the helpless prize, slaves to both of their creators/legal owners. Families break up because the entire notion and definition of what families are, should be, and how they are created and maintained, has absolutely no legitimate basis in Truth. Families break up because it is completely unnatural for people to enslave themselves to each other, and to be legally compelled to remain enmeshed with each other for decades of time. Families break up because people want to have sex for pleasure, and having sex with a person that you have come to hate and despise, as usually occurs within "couple" relationships, provides little if any pleasure. And having sex for pleasure, while likely not instinctually natural for the earliest, primitive, stone age humans, is completely legal, moral, and appropriate behavior for all adults. Societal attempts to terroristically compel families to stay together, using moral, cultural, and legal terrorization, constitute an outrageous attack upon and stripping of the most basic, individual, personal freedom and autonomy rights. The notion that prostitution "causes men to stray from their wives", is even more perverse and ludicrous. Men stray from their wives because marriage is a completely toxic, completely unnatural, brutally harmful form of enslavement, an utterly artificial construct of society, that carries virtually no benefits to any individual. Men have intimate sexual contact with people other than their wives, because it is completely unnatural for any person who has sex for personal pleasure, to be restricted in such a way as to be compelled to have all sexual activity only involve contact with one, specific, human being, the "wife". And of course this exact same Truth is just as applicable to women, they have the exact same personal inclination, on an emotional and intellectual level, to have sex for personal pleasure and climax, as men do.

Moving on, lets give some thought to the structural ramifications of artificially induced sex drive. What am I talking about? Very simply, things like the drug Viagra. This drug, just like many others, both prescription and over the counter, is designed to artificially increase and induce a person's sexual drive and physical ability, as well as interest in, having sex. There is an enormous market in civilized, 21st century human society, for these artificial sex drive enhancers. It's interesting to note that they are marketed as products which "help a person to perform better, sexually." Is sex a performance?? Not in a sane society, that has rational, Truth-based definitions. Sex is an act of personal pleasure and release of personal energy. And yet society instructs you creatures that sex is in reality a performance, something that you are not doing for yourself, but rather for someone else. Your societies are not sane, rational, or truth-based. Your society tells you that you need to impress someone else, when you have sex. You need to satisfy another person, when you have sex. This is the structural framework upon which Viagra, dozens of other prescription drugs, and thousands of non-prescription drugs, all of which claim to "enhance sexual drive", rest. It is true that some people have medical illnesses which interfere with their ability to achieve sexual climax. It's also true that some people have psychological thinking patterns which interfere with this ability. The question is, when and why is it medically justified for society to overtly encourage and enable people to enhance their sexual drive, and what is the societal motivation behind such encouragement. Having sex, or at least one specific aspect of having sex, namely achieving climax, is a pleasurable experience for most people. Pleasure is generally a good thing. But achieving any specific type of pleasure is almost never vital for health or well-being, be it physical or emotional. Society has brainwashed you creatures into believing that it is vital that you be able to have sex, that you be able to sexually climax, and on top of this, that you be able to sexually satisfy other people, not merely yourself. These notions are completely invalid. There are thousands of different things that can be enjoyed in life. Having sex or achieving sexual climax is simply one potentially pleasurable activity/achievement, among thousands. Yes, I would agree that in a limited number of select situations, in which a person, due to a clear medical illness, is able to get sexually excited/aroused but unable to achieve sexual climax, the use of artificial sex drive enhancers might be appropriate, in order to help the person achieve the final, most important step of the process, the climax or orgasm. However, this is not how your diseased societies use Viagra and other types of enhancement drugs. The artificial substances are most often used to create a "sexual drive", to allow people to become sexually aroused and excited. This constitutes an invalid use, and it demonstrates the perverse attitudes towards sex that lie at the root of your diseased societies. Having sex is offered as a bribe to you creatures, by your societies. It is used as an appeasement device to get you to agree to accept vicious, brutal oppression and victimization from society. You are told that you need to satisfy someone else when you have sex. Men are told and taught by society that unless they are able to provide a great deal of sexual pleasure to their female "lover", mate, or spouse, she will abandon him, and women are encouraged to do just that, to abandon men who are unable or unwilling to engage in frequent, intercourse-based sex acts with them. Once again, the whole perverse issue of citizen-slaves being used as breeders by society, comes into play, and the exact same outrageous societal decrees apply to women. Most women were subjected to sexual victimization as children. As adults, some of them manage to find the internal courage to try and establish emotionally positive relationships with other people, both women and men. But societal decree holds that the woman must relive and recreate her own sexual victimization, in order to enjoy a "proper", intimate relationship with a man. She is told that she must have intimate sexual contact with a man, in order to have a true, legitimate relationship based upon "love", with him. But the reality is that romantic love does not exist, and the number of women, and men, who endure horrific trauma while trying to meet the perverse societal decree that they are morally obligated to engage in "sexual relations" in order to both establish and maintain close relationships, is huge. Amazingly, many people who take Viagra and other artificial sex drive enhancers, do so out of a sense of obligation to other people that they feel compelled to try and have sex with. On a core emotional level, they don't want to engage in intimate sexual contact with the other person, but their society has terroristically convinced them they are under an obligation to both engage in such contact, and to try and provide a maximum degree of sexual pleasure to the other person, as well as to themselves, but in most cases the strongest motivation for taking artificial sex enhancers put forth by society is the decreed obligation to satisfy not your own, personal sexual needs, but the sexual desires and needs of another person or other people. Men are told that unless they climax while having sex with a woman, they will never win the "romantic love" of any woman, or enjoy the imaginary bliss of having a "family". Women are told that unless they completely agree to help a man achieve sexual climax, and meekly accept all of his sexual demands and impositions, they will never enjoy a live-in lover or marriage relationship with any man, and they too will be robbed of the glorious "family" that is supposed to be the life goal of all citizen-slaves, as decreed by society. All citizen-slaves are told that sexual activity should be designed and undertaken for the specific purpose of meeting another person's desires/needs, not your own desires/needs. This is utterly perverse and genocidally harmful to individuals, and to their most basic personal autonomy and appropriately self-centered natures.

Artificial enhancement of sexual drive causes more harm than good, in most cases. There is no reason why a person who has a great deal of trouble becoming sexually aroused, should deliberately attempt to artificially arouse himself, via the use of brain and body chemistry altering drugs and substances. If the person chooses to do this because he/she feels an obligation to match or meet or satisfy the sexual needs of someone else, be it a spouse or just people he/she might casually date, he/she is violating and betraying the love of self that should exist, rule, and dictate all life choices and paths for the individual. If the person believes that sex is so immensely pleasurable that he is missing out on an absolutely vital part of life by being unable to climax or unable to "enjoy" having sex, then he is laboring under an utterly tragic, irrational delusion. Having sex is pleasurable to some people, disgusting to other people. The same goes for having a climax. Many people find pleasure from achieving a sexual climax. But other people do not. There is nothing inherently or mystically pleasurable about having sex & having climaxes. Pleasure is a subjective term, that has no definition validity which extends to others. For example, some people find pleasure in eating chocolate, but other people don't like chocolate. Some people are allergic to chocolate. There is nothing inherently "pleasurable" about chocolate, and there is nothing inherently pleasurable about having sex or achieving sexual climax. If a person does not like chocolate, or is allergic to chocolate, the person generally chooses to simply refrain from eating chocolate. They find other things in life which provide them with pleasure. They do not become obsessed with eating chocolate, and they do not consume drugs and artificial substances that are designed to try and allow them to eat chocolate. This is because society has not imposed a brutally terroristic doctrine upon them, in which they are told that they must eat regularly eat chocolate, and they must derive extreme pleasure from eating chocolate, in order to be considered "normal" or to enjoy any type of a culturally appropriate and proper quality of life, which is exactly the doctrine that is imposed upon you citizen-slaves with regard to the issue of having sex. If a person is unable to climax or derive pleasure from having sex with another person, the very first form of "treatment" that should be attempted, assuming the person actually and sincerely wants to derive pleasure or achieve climax via sex, is to examine and ascertain if the person is able to derive sexual pleasure and/or achieve climax while engaging in solo, or otherwise masturbatory type of sexual activity. If in fact the person can derive pleasure or climax in this manner, this proves there is absolutely nothing physically wrong with the person, and it should be illegal for any physician to prescribe artificial sex drive enhancing drugs for the person. What this also proves is that the person simply does not enjoy intimate sexual contact with the other person. Their "problem" is caused by the fact that they are trying to have sex in an inappropriate manner, a manner that contradicts their own personal, unique True Reality. And of course, as I have already outlined, masturbation is not only a completely valid way to have sex, it is also, on a fundamental level, the safest and best way to have sex, for a majority of people. All societies have an obligation to recognize and embrace this Truth, in all aspects and facets of it's design structure.

For example, many people choose to seek out psychotherapy because they believe they suffer from "sex problems". In most cases, these problems are not valid and not real. But instead of properly informing the person as to the true nature of the situation, therapists attempt to appease the delusional, irrational demands of the patient, usually accomplishing nothing more than adding to the long-term emotional anxiety and suffering of the individual. A woman goes to see a psychiatrist. She is married, but does not enjoy having sex with her husband. Instead of exploring the woman's sexual options, her potential ability to enjoy sexual pleasure on her own, as well as legitimizing the fact that she is under absolutely no obligation to "find a way to endure/enjoy sex with the husband", the psychiatrist will embrace perverse societal decree, and deal with this woman from the position of trying to find a way to enable her to have sex with her husband, thus adding to her problem, reinforcing her trauma and stress by insanely adopting the attitude that she "needs" to have sex with her husband, and that the goal of her therapy must be to help her find a way to recognize and embrace the notion that she needs to have sex with hubby. This is ridiculous! The reason why she does not enjoy having sex with hubby, is most likely the fact that the relationship is a toxic one, and for her, personally, having sex with this man is either extremely, torturously traumatic at worst, or not the best, easiest, most personally normal way for her to enjoy sexual pleasure, at best. Even in the best case scenario, there is absolutely no legitimate reason for why the therapy would be specifically designed to try and help her cope with and enjoy having sex with her hubby, instead of trying to help her find a potentially better, healthier, less stressful way to enjoy sexual pleasure, such as self-stimulation. What we see here is societally sanctified Sacred Family Unit mythology, combined with an outrageous stripping of properly narcissistic self-involvement. Throughout her lifetime, and including her psychiatric treatment, this woman is brainwashed into believing that she needs a husband, she needs to sexually satisfy her husband, and that achieving sexual pleasure for herself is virtually meaningless, even a "sin", while giving sexual pleasure to another person, her hubby, is extremely important and needs to be the core focus of her existence. Sacrifice yourself, your own needs, desires, well-being, safety, and life. This is the most precious, core building block of your ultra-diseased, ultra-evil society. It extends into every single area of life, inflicting genocidal harm upon billions of human beings every year, human being who have been stripped of the precious, irreplaceable, inborn ability and instinct to love and value themselves, to place their own needs/desires ahead of the needs/desires of others. Imagine a woman has a cancerous tumor, she goes to a doctor for treatment, and he tells her to "try and cope with your tumor, it's not so bad, try to make the best of having a cancerous tumor. The tumor is a part of you, an important part of you. The best thing for us to do is try to get you to feel emotionally better about having this tumor." Does this make any rational sense?? No! And yet if you substitute the word husband for the word tumor, this is exactly how psychiatrists and psychologists will "treat" the woman who comes to them complaining of finding it very difficult and unpleasant to have sex with her husband. They will tell her: "try and cope with your husband, it's not so bad, try to make the best of having a husband. Your husband is a part of you, an important part of you, and your Sacred Family Unit. The best thing for us to do is try to get you to feel emotionally better about having sex with your husband." You see, exactly the same! And yet you diseased creatures can appreciate the absurdity of the cancer doctor offering the treatment I have outlined above, but at the same time you see nothing wrong with the psychiatrist/psychologist offering the exact same treatment. You are blind to Truth and logic, because Truth is your mortal enemy, having been born into and raised up within a malevolent, lie-based society.

I want to conclude by revealing the Truth that at least 99.9% of all people who take artificial, sex-drive enhancers, both prescription and non-prescription, are doing so for invalid reasons, that at worst have horrific consequences, and at best simply cover up and suppress the True issues, problems, and needs that the person should be attempting to resolve in a psychologically sane, Truth-based manner. Neither societal leaders, nor their agents, such as psychiatric professionals, have any right to attempt to convince people who do not enjoy sex or any specific type of sexual activity, who do not derive pleasure from having sex, who are not able to sexually climax, or who are unable to satisfy the sexual needs of someone else, such as a spouse, that they should, need to, or have any type of obligation to engage in such sexual activity, or to try and find a way to enjoy the sexual activity, that is in any way restrictive, sacred family unit/marriage/intercourse-based, that in any way requires artificial stimulation/enhancement, or that requires the person to relive or experience an event that has left a traumatic imprint upon the person's own unique, True Reality.

Next item up for dissection is the societal notion of "sexual freedom". I'm going to be writing an entire essay in which I dissect all of the perverse societal myths and brainwashings regarding all different forms of societally bestowed "freedom", but lets just focus on the one myth, of sexual freedom, here. Democratic and election-based governments absolutely love to terroristically throw the myth of freedom into the faces of their citizen-slaves, as a way to obtain their "patriotic loyalty", or at the very least, to keep their citizen-slaves from rising up and overthrowing the oppressive, malevolent, regime that is in place. You are told that you enjoy freedom, when in fact you live under utterly fascist domination and oppression, you are told how "lucky" you are to be free, and that you owe your freedom to your society and the government that is in current power, and in addition, you are occasionally given minor, throwaway freedoms that are specifically designed to appease you, while your society continues to deny you all genuine, valuable freedoms. The myth of sexual freedom applies to all of the above revelations, and it very specifically applies to the issue of a minor, throwaway freedom that can and is used as a form of citizen-slave appeasement in crisis situations. First of all, none of you enjoy sexual freedom. No society on planet earth offers genuine sexual freedom to it's citizens. Every society deliberately and terroristically attempts to mold, shape, control, and dictate the sexual life choices of all of their citizen-slaves, and this fascist process begins on the very day that each child is born. But what is even more fascinating, to a scholar of truth, is the manner with which societies will redouble their efforts to convince citizen-slaves that they do enjoy sexual freedom, when a crisis situation which could potentially result in widespread social unrest, rioting, and the like, appears on the horizon.

A perfect and recent demonstration of this Truth, can be found in america, in the years immediately after the Vietnam War began. Every war that america has ever been involved in, has been an immoral, unnecessary, toxic event. You pathetic citizen-slaves never have had the sanity and freedom of thought to recognize, much less embrace, this Truth. However, in the case of the Vietnam War, somehow, a decent percentage of young citizen-slaves in america did find the internal strength and insight to recognize what an incredibly perverse, immoral outrage their society was undertaking, in their names. Some young people refused to enlist and serve in the military, in moral protest of this genocidal event, as sponsored by american societal leaders. Others organized protests, burned american flags, and otherwise threatened to cause civil disturbances within the society. In fact, riots and other extremely violent demonstrations did occur in america. This is when societal leaders, in a very deliberate and purposeful manner, decided to inform the young people in america, that they were being given more sexual freedom. Mind you, the president couldn't and didn't have a press conference in which he told all of america that they could have sex with whomever they wished. Of course not! This would terrify and upset the majority of citizen-slaves, the older generations, and many young people who had embraced sexual fascism as imposed upon them by society for their entire lives. There was no "publically decreed" change in american policy regarding sexual activity. And yet societal leaders absolutely did overtly inform their target audience, young, rebellious citizens, that they should feel free to sexually experiment and explore, in a way that no other previous generation of americans had been allowed to do. Why was this move and decision made by society?? It was made because the leadership recognized that there was a significant danger of severe social unrest occurring, and continuing to increase in intensity, among young citizen-slaves in america, as a result of the Vietnam War. Recognizing this, societal leaders overtly and in a cunningly malevolent manner, decided to promote sexual freedom to young people, knowing that young people are generally obsessed with sex, and hoping that many of the enraged, rebellious youths who were creating social unrest by revealing the Truth concerning genocidal american activities, would be enticed into abandoning their "political" activism, and instead embracing the "new" sexual freedom that society was offering them, as bait.

Did it work?? Yes, tragically, it worked just fine. The "hippie" and "free love" movements drew in most of the youthful Vietnam protestors, while the rioting and overtly strident, public condemnation of american governmental policy, lessened. It lessened because the young citizen-slaves took the poisoned societal bait, they embraced the new sexual "freedom" that society was giving to them, a freedom that they, and every citizen on planet earth, should have always had in the past and should always have in the present and future. Was there anything wrong with embracing sexual freedom, at that time? Not really. The perversity lies in the fact that after 300+ years of utter sexual fascism, american societal leaders offered this sexual freedom disguised as a "gift", for the specifically malevolent purpose of distracting and confusing and changing the focus of attention of their enraged, tortured, young citizen-slaves. And note that after the Vietnam War ended, quite quickly, this brief period of pseudo sexual freedom came to an end, as societal leaders recognized that the threat of widespread rioting, civil unrest, and possible overthrow of the government, was no longer in play. This malevolent societal misdirection play worked very well, and so if and when there is a similar type of social unrest crisis in america, involving young people, you can expect societal leaders to seriously consider and very possibly implement, this exact same type of a brief loosening of sexual fascism, designed to accomplish the exact same societal goal as was achieved during the Vietnam era. The interesting thing is that you citizen-slaves were and are so broken, so brainwashed, so completely unable to recognize the malevolent manipulations of your society, that this Truth was never recognized by the vast majority of you. Most hippies and free love devotees of the Vietnam War era thought they were being "radical", "rebelling against the establishment", by plunging headfirst into an embrace of their new sexual freedom, when in reality, their society wanted them to choose what it judged to be the lesser of two evils. It wanted them to choose sexual "freedom" over political activism, in order to continue to suppress profound Truth from the public at large, retain the support of the public at large, and continue to commit mass murder and genocide, in Vietnam. They could not recognize this Truth, and even in hindsight today, only a tiny handful of truly Superior philosophers and dissectors of societally hidden and denied Truth, such as myself, are able to recognize and understand the factual reality, of how american society, in the 1960's, specifically desired and steered it's enraged youth, towards embracing sexual freedom, recognizing that this would cause a majority of them to either abandon outright, or greatly diminish, their political activism and stridently public condemnations of american governmental policies.

Throughout the history of humanity, no society has ever granted it's citizens genuine sexual freedom and autonomy. Every society has malevolently and terroristically steered, guided, and compelled the vast majority of it's citizen-slaves, into accepting and embracing the very specific, extremely narrow, and immensely oppressive behavioral agenda regarding sex, that the leaders of the society desired to impose upon the citizen-slaves. Every manner of threat and coercion has been and continues to be employed. Ridicule, cultural demonization, discrimination, loss of employment, banishment, imprisonment in jails and mental institutions, and outright murder, have all been practiced by societies as official policy, to terroristically compel citizen-slaves to censor, deny, and reject their own sexual interests and desires. All of these forms of malevolent oppression continue to be actively practiced in the 21st century, within all societies. In america, a person who has never harmed any child, but is found to be possessing or distributing material that is labeled as "child pornography", faces imprisonment, specifically because of his societally demonized sexual interest, not because he has harmed anyone. Societal agents, acting on behalf of societal leaders, overtly attempt to entrap citizen-slaves into either purchasing or sharing child pornography material, then insanely arrest them for committing a "crime", that only occurred because the societal agents lied to the individual, and entrapped the individual. This is exactly the same design structure that was used during the Salem, Massachusetts witch trials of the 1700's, in america. People who have harmed nobody, are swept up in a fascist societal frenzy, demonized, and held out in terroristic fashion, as examples to all citizen-slaves of the threat that they face if they dare to try and stand up for the sexual freedom rights that their society falsely claims to provide. The illusion of sexual freedom is given, while the reality is that utter fascism rules.

The insane god myth, and religion as a whole, has been used throughout history by societal leaders, to impose sexual fascism. The "bible" and other "holy" texts promote insane human constructs such as marriage, instruct citizen-slaves to only have sex with members of the opposite gender, to limit the number of people they have sexual contact with, and to avoid masturbating. These are all fascist sexual policies that human societal leaders in most societies, seek to promote and impose upon citizen-slaves, and as usual, they find the insane god myth to be a perfect tool for achieving the goal of terrorizing most citizens into accepting these bizarre, unnatural, insane behavioral demands. As usual, it is the societies which claim to be the most "free and democratic", such as america, which impose the greatest degree of sexual fascism upon their citizen-slaves. The vehemence with which homosexuals are condemned, proud masturbators are condemned, afficionados of child pornography are condemned, is unmatched by any other society, especially when you take into account the way in which american society tells you that you enjoy sexual freedom. You could argue that some Moslem societies impose even more brutal and narrow sexual fascism decrees upon their citizens, than is the case in the USA. This might be true, to a slight degree. However, when you take into account the fact that most Moslem citizen-slaves know that they do not enjoy sexual freedom within their society, and are not laboring under the delusion and overtly told societal lie that they enjoy sexual freedom, while american citizen-slaves absolutely do labor under this malevolent delusion, it is clear that the degree of genuine sexual oppression and victimization is greater in america, even if the actual behavioral demands of Moslem society might be somewhat more brutal and the range of permissible sexual activity somewhat more narrow, on an overall level.

I've already covered the issue of sexual attraction quite well, so just a few final points of emphasis here. Sexual attraction is a unique, individualistic, True Reality-based experience. There is no valid standard and no valid limitation as to what constitutes "legitimate" sexual attraction. People can be sexually attracted to members of their own gender, members of the other gender, children, animals, specific parts of a human body, inanimate objects, physical sensations such as pain, specific images, specific fantasies. Every form of sexual attraction is equally valid, to each individual. No individual has any obligation or need to explain or justify their own unique attraction to anyone else or to society at large, and society has absolutely no moral or cultural entitlement to condemn, mock, ridicule, or inflict any type of punitive punishment upon anyone, due to their unique sexual attraction. Human beings develop a True Reality based upon their own interpretation of the sum total of their life experiences. Therefore, even though the exact nature of each person's sexual attractions is completely unique, there is a great deal of influence that society wields in terms of how popular and common various forms of sexual attraction become. In 21st century america, more men are sexually attracted to women's breasts, than are sexually attracted to women's feet, and this is because female breasts are overtly put forth by societal doctrine, as being sexually exciting. Society attempts to coerce men into agreeing to view women's breasts are being sexually attractive, and uses the threat of labeling any man who refuses to accept women's breasts as being sexually attractive, as abnormal. This threat results in a high percentage of men, who generally do not try to think much for themselves and are eager to avoid receiving any negative label from society, accepting and embracing the notion that female breasts are sexually attractive body parts that they should focus some of their sexual thoughts and energy towards. This fact does not grant any legitimacy to the notion that a person sexually attracted to women's feet, or to an elephant's trunk, or to a gun, is in any way "abnormal", or deserving of any type of negative societal/cultural judgement.

In 1700, in China, tiny, deformed, crippled women's feet were the object of even more intense and pervasive sexual attraction from male citizen-slaves, than is the case with men and women's breasts in year 2001 america. What this proves, to any sane thinker, is that societal leaders are able and absolutely do, manipulate, guide, and control which types of sexual attractions become popular and pervasive, while others are left with the label of "bizarre, abnormal". Children growing up, teen-agers, and adults, are all placed under pressure by society, to conform their sexual attraction to "normal" standards and parameters, with the definitions of what constitutes normalcy, being nothing more than artificial constructs of society, operating under an agenda of fascist imposition and oppression, not benevolent freedom and open-minded acceptance. How dare you creatures, in 2001 america, have the audacity to label someone who might be extremely sexually excited by tiny and deformed women's feet, as being an "abnormal pervert", when your society is terroristically promoting women's breasts to you, as being supremely sexual body parts, in exactly the same manner as 1700 Chinese societal leaders promoted tiny and deformed women's feet as being supremely sexual body parts! The degree and the glaringly obvious but still denied nature of your narrow-minded, perversely hypocritical minds and thinking patterns, never ceases to amaze me.

A few words need to be said here on sexual attraction to children. Sexual attraction towards children is no more abnormal than any other type of sexual attraction. It is in fact extremely common and popular, more so than most other avenues of sexual attraction. There are several reasons for this, but first and foremost, is the fact that most civilized societies in the year 2001, overtly promote and encourage both the sexual objectification of young human beings, and the sexual desirability of young human beings, on a constant, determined, frenzied level. Virgins are declared to be the most sexually desirable of humans, and virgins are usually young. The less sexually experienced a person is, the more desirable they are a sexual partner, decrees society. The younger you are, the more "perfect" your body is said to be, perfect as in sexually attractive/desirable. Throughout all aspects of the media, youth is trumpeted as being extremely sexy and sexually desirable, while advancing age is declared to be a relative turnoff. It's not just "old people" who are declared to be sexual turnoffs, but rather >u>any person who is aging is generally decreed to be less sexually desirable than a "young" person. Since all living creatures are aging, we all begin aging the moment we are born, this aging issue is a very important one. The societal doctrine is that any person who is aging, is losing sexual desirability. Since we are all aging, this very specifically means that the younger a person is, the less they have aged, and therefore the more sexually desirable they are. Society is on an absolute campaign to deliberately sexualize youth, and obviously, since only young people have youth, they are deliberately and intentionally sexualized. But we have several other factors which contribute greatly to the high degree of sexual obsession with children and teen-agers. Most victims of sexual abuse, began to be abused, received the bulk of their abuse, and received the most emotionally traumatic incidents of sexual abuse, when they were children. Within cathartic, reflective, True Reality mindset, many of these tortured victim-creations of society develop a personal need to claim vengeance, by sexually attacking other children, once they reach adulthood. There is a natural cathartic release of pain, for many people, in victimizing other people in a very similar manner to how they were themselves victimized. This is one reason why very few rapists target elderly people for sexual attack, while a great many rapists target children for sexual victimization. The rapist is a torture victim, and he was likely raped when he was a child, not when he was elderly. Because he was sexually tortured as a child, his reflective, True Reality quest for personal vengeance, is much more likely to revolve around victimizing children, than the elderly. Of course there are exceptions to every general rule, and some victims of childhood sexual torture will only target adults, who remind them of their abusers, for cathartic reflection of their True Reality rage. And many other such childhood victims will not direct their rage outward at all, in any type of a sexually violent manner.

Then we have the "forbidden fruit/bait" aspect, in which society superficially pretends to be obsessed with protecting children from sexual victimization, while at the same time putting them forth as "tantalizing", superior, sexual creatures. This attracts additional sexual obsessiveness from some people, because whenever society declares something to be "taboo", while in the same breath extolling the virtues and benefits/advantages of the taboo object, the perverse interest level of societal devotees, increases. On top of all this, we have real children and teenagers being taught, told, and convinced by society, to flaunt their physical appearance in public, to try and make themselves look sexually attractive. Mix all these ingredients together, and we are left with an incredibly high percentage of adults, lets define this as age 21 and older, being sexually interested and drawn to children, with the definition of child being birth until age 21, for a tremendously varying number of reasons, all of which the direct consequence of direct societal policy and individual victimization. I would estimate that at least 25% of all adults, male and female, are sexually drawn to children, to some degree. At least 10% of all men are primarily and most intensely attracted by youth, as a sexual excitement trigger. Again, the two primary reasons for this are: #1: Sexual victimization suffered by these individuals when they were themselves children, and #2: The pervasive, overt, deliberate societal message, given to all citizen-slaves, that young people are sexually attractive, desirable, "perfect", and provide/offer the best, most exciting, pleasurable, rewarding, and satisfying types of interactive sexual contact.

Just as is the case with all "crimes", the individual who sexually victimizes children is not "guilty" af anything. This individual is a tortured victim-creation of society. His chosen life activities are nothing more than accurate reflections of the utterly brutal, perverse, unjust victimization that he was personally subjected to, during the course of his lifetime and most primarily, during his childhood. When it comes to the specific "crime" of sexual abuse, be it of children, women, and even men, an entire additional layer of societal brutalization, is added to the existing reality of brutal victimization that all criminals are subjected to. The sexualization and subsequent victimization of children is a culturally and societally advocated, promoted, and embraced policy, of most 21st century societies. All of the Truths that I have already outlined above, in this essay, serve to encourage and legitimize sexual victimization. Society legitimizes this mass victimization, and yet in the same breath it has the audacity to condemn, demonize, and inflict punitive punishment upon some sexually abusive torture victims, that it is completely guilty of and responsible for having created. Absolutely outrageous, the hypocrisy!

Within a sane society, sexual attraction to children would be accepted as being completely harmless, because it is perfectly harmless. The only way that a person being sexually attracted to children could cause harm, is if the person chooses to seek out an actual, living, child, and sexually attacks the child in a violent, traumatic manner. It is the insane, irrational, malevolent societal policies towards sex that are currently being promoted and legitimized within your societies, which causes the people who are sexually attracted to children, to choose to sexually impose themselves upon children in a violent, traumatic manner. The demonization of masturbation, the lie that having intimate sexual contact with another human being is the best and only proper way to have sex, the instruction from society that sex is to be used as a weapon, as a source of power and oppression of another human being. These are the true "crimes", and they are not being committed by individual victims of society, they are being committed by society itself, it's leadership and it's empowered agents. In a sane society, the person who is sexually attracted to children would have unquestioned, unlimited access to countless thousands of stories, drawings, paintings, photos, videotapes, which describe or depict romantic situations involving children. The person would know that masturbation provides the best type of sexual release. The person will have been taught how to use his mind to create erotic fantasies. The person will have learned that children, real-life, living children, can be traumatized by unwanted sexual contact, but at the same time, the person will know that there is nothing "terrible", or even wrong, about being sexually attracted to children. Society will tell the person that their sexual interest is just as valid as any other person's sexual interest, and at the same time, there is absolutely no need to actually cause any harm to any real-life children, in order to experience complete sexual fulfillment and release. Upon request, the person will be given extremely life-like dolls, made to appear as close to real children as possible in every way, so that the person can more easily achieve the fantasy of being with a real-life child, if in fact this is still a core component of his sexual interest. That is the Truth, and if properly implemented, by a sane, Truth-based society, together with the other reforms concerning sex that I have outlined above, these policies would prevent at least 80% of all sexual abuse of children that currently occurs, from occurring. Not 100%, probably not even 90%, but at least 80%. Why only 80-90%? Because some sexual abusers of children are motivated primarily by a personal need for vengeance, to hurt other children as they themselves were hurt when they were children. These Truths would not deter them, because they are not primarily interested in achieving sexual pleasure and release, but rather in satiating and soothing their rage. But the reality is that 80-90% of all child sex abusers, even those who were themselves sexually abused as children, do not have a primary motivation of wanting to cause harm to children, but instead have a primary motivation of wanting to gain sexual pleasure and release. The primary, in some cases only reason why this 80-90% majority actually attack real-life children, is because of the perverse, malevolent lies, myths, hypocrisies, irrationalities, and invalidly fascist restrictions and limitations on sexual Truth, that society has imposed upon them, and addicted them into embracing.

The simple fact of demonizing sexual attraction to children, and demonizing the person who is revealed to be sexually attracted to children, is the root of the problem. The person is denied all legal access to material which he can use to satisfy his sexual interest, he is forced to live each day in terror, keeping the Truth of his sexual interests a secret. He is made to feel as though he is evil simply for being sexually attracted to children, this causes him to embrace the invalid notion that he is evil, and once this notion is embraced, why not go on to actually target real-life children?? Live up to the deranged expectations that society has of you, and the invalid label that society has malevolently attached to you. The person is taught that masturbation is an inferior way to have sex, even though the exact opposite is true. Every time the person masturbates, he feels unfulfilled, because he is laboring under the delusion that there is a superior, mystical quality to the very specific act of intimately manipulating the sexual body parts of another human being. And society is responsible for and guilty of implanting this delusion within this person's mind!

Amazingly, you creatures labor under the insane notion that "to legitimize sexual attraction towards children, would cause more people to sexually attack children." This is ridiculous! Many people are sexually attracted to children, and the more you condemn, demonize, ostracize, and refuse to help them to accept their own sexual interests and find Superior, Truth-based ways to achieve sexual pleasure and release, the more likely they are to be driven to sexually attack children. Your logical thinking and deductive reasoning skills, as usual, are 100% invalid, nonsensical, and upside down! Sexual attraction to children is legitimate, it is harmless, it is here to stay, and your society is responsible for causing people to become sexually attracted to children. Unless you, as a society and as individuals, can face up to and embrace these Truths, you stand no chance of being able to take the additional steps in logic, that are required to undertake the proper, sane reforms that would absolutely prevent at least 80% of all child sexual attack/abuse, from occurring. I want to conclude by emphasizing a core Truth from my Crime essay: All "criminals", all people who hurt or harm another living thing, are tortured victim-creations of society. They are victims, deserving of absolutely no type of condemnation, demonization, or punitive punishment of any kind. This includes child sex abusers, of course. The societal reforms regarding sex that I have outlined above, even if implemented and embraced and put into practice by a society, would in no way grant any legitimacy to the notion that violent child sex abusers can or should receive any type of condemnation, or be subjected to any type of punitive punishment.

Let us move on to sex education, which is a complete farce within all civilized societies as of the 21st century. Most societies leave virtually all sex education in the hands of slaveowners, empowering parents to mold their children in their own perverse images, infecting them with the same sexual insanity that they themselves were infected with when they were children. Churches and other societally empowered agents, are used to further warp and destroy the ability of children to come to any type of a sane or rational understanding/attitude towards sex and sexuality. Any school-based efforts undertaken by societies to teach the biological facts regarding sex, which have only occurred within the past hundred years or so, have been specifically designed to reinforce the insane, mainstream lies that parents and churches are expected to give and tell to their children. The entire sex-ed structure of schools, is designed to teach children to have intercourse and to create babies, even though society claims that it has an exactly opposite goal, to stop children from having intercourse and creating babies. It is a lie! If the societal goal was to stop children from having intercourse, sex-ed classes would not focus on the biological methodology of how babies are created, but rather on how to achieve sexual pleasure and release in superior, harmless ways, such as masturbation. Everyone knows that children love to do what they are told not to do, especially when they know that grown-ups are doing it and even more especially when they have been led to believe that the specific thing they are not supposed to do, will provide the greatest, most exciting experience that they have ever enjoyed in their entire lives. We also know that adolescence brings with it the most intense, powerful sex drive that most people experience, in their entire lives. So, if schools specifically choose to teach the biological methodology of how children are created, and in turn lecture children on one specific form of sex, intercourse, instructing them to not have intercourse but at the same time putting forth intercourse as the only legitimate, seriously discussed way to have sex, then of course a majority of children will choose to have intercourse-type sex, with each other, when they first become sexually active. There are virtually no sex-ed classes in schools, sexual education in churches, or sexual instruction from parents, that discusses masturbation. Interestingly, masturbation is not stridently condemned, but rather it is almost completely ignored, dismissed, and this proves even more strongly, how eager your society is to addict children to the lie that intercourse is the best, only appropriate way to have sex. As I have already stated above, children and adolescents are most interested in "taboo" subjects. When an issue, subject, or life option is completely ignored and dismissed by adults, it is not considered taboo by children, and therefore children usually show little interest. But when an issue, subject, or lifestyle choice is stridently, hysterically, obsessively condemned by adults, it becomes fascinating, appealing, and desirable to children and adolescents. So, masturbation is ignored and dismissed, for the most part, by parents, churches, and schools, in their sexual "education" efforts, while intercourse-type sex is stridently, hysterically, obsessively focused on and condemned by adults, even though most children understand that the adults are "having sex" themselves, and the adults expect them to have intercourse at some point in the future, when they are "grown up". The end result, of course, is that children overwhelmingly choose to embrace and undertake intimate, intercourse-type sexual activity, proudly bragging about it to other children, while at the same time embracing the societal lie that masturbation is a highly inferior, improper, shameful way to have sex, even if they themselves do masturbate while alone at home, as virtually all adolescents do. How many children come to school all excited, eager to tell all their classmates that they masturbated the night before? None! How many children who have intercourse-type sexual contact with a classmate, are eager to brag about and inform all of their schoolmates that they "fooled around" with the classmate the night before?? A majority! This is because the sex education system is specifically designed and structured in such a way as to encourage, popularize, and addict children and adolescents to intercourse-type sexual activity, while discouraging, demonizing, and attaching all types of negative, inferior connotations to masturbation, as well as to other Superior but societally undesirable ways to have sex.

It's also very interesting to note that if you examine the details of criminal cases in which children or adolescents sexually "attack" each other, you will find that in a strong majority of these so-called "criminal" attacks, the type of sexual contact which occurs is intercourse or intercourse-type focused. There are very few oral sex attacks among children and adolescents, and this too is because the sex education system chooses to obsessively focus on intercourse/procreation sexual activity, in it's ridiculous sermons, condemnations, and "teachings". Understand this: Everyone knows that adolescents have a raging sex drive and will find a way to relieve their biological/emotional sexual obsessions. The only genuine issue at hand is how, by what method, will the adolescent achieve sexual release. It is clear, beyond all reasonable doubt, that societal policy and doctrine, as reflected via parental instruction of children, religious institution instruction of children, and school teaching of children, has the very specific and undeniable goal and agenda of getting children and adolescents to embrace intercourse-type sex as the only proper way to have sex, and to cause children and adolescents to choose and to engage in intercourse-type sex, above all other available options for achieving sexual release/pleasure.

Within any sane societal structure, adolescents would be proud of the fact that they masturbate. They would feel pride in informing schoolmates that they masturbate. They would recognize, as a result of sane and proper societal teaching, that masturbation is an absolutely ideal way to meet all sexual needs, a Superior, safe way, that reflects positively upon them. They would not become addicted to the insane notion that "close, affectionate relationships" need to involve intimate sexual contact. This perverse notion, a societally taught and induced lie, is responsible for much of the emotional agony, trauma, self-abuse, murder, even suicide, that plagues the adolescent human population. The school curriculum regarding sex education would be completely revised, with a focus on the actual reasons that human beings in the 21st century have sex, to achieve pleasure and cathartic physical/emotional release, rather than to procreate. Sure, intercourse and condoms would be mentioned, briefly. But Truth would never be withheld. All of the safest, Superior ways to achieve sexual pleasure and release, would be openly discussed and revealed to be what they are, Superior. Children would be told: "If you want to have a baby, you have to have sex in a very specific way. But this particular way of having sex is no better, does not provide more physical pleasure, and is not more "normal", than other ways to have sex are. And in fact, as will be explained to you, there are many other ways to have sex which usually provide even greater physical pleasure and freedom, without carrying the negative drawbacks and risks that the baby-producing way to have sex, carries with it." Sex education, as currently practiced by societies, is nothing but a pathetic farce, It's goal is not provide even an iota of actual enlightenment, Truth, or revelation to any "student", but rather to terroristically and coercively impose a fascist, lie-based, irrational and harmful sexual agenda upon all students.

The motivational structures which give rise to crimes of "rape", which is the forcible sexual assault of another human being, have the same foundations as child sex attacks have. Overwhelmingly, men are rapists. Men rape women, and men rape other men. Women very rarely rape men or each other, in a forcible manner. This is not because women have significantly less of a sex drive, and it's not because the average woman is physically less powerful than the average man. It is because a woman who wants to have intimate sexual contact with another person, even if she is penniless and not particularly beautiful as judged by the insane standards of attractiveness used by the society in question, will have no difficulty finding someone to have intimate sexual contact with her. But men do have difficulty. Women want things from men, in exchange for agreeing to have sex with them. Women make men feel like they are doing them a "favor" if they agree to have sex with them. Women want men to pretend to "love" them, before agreeing to have sex with them, even though there is no such thing as romantic love. Prostitutes make some men feel extremely inferior, thanks to the insane societal decree that prostitutes are bad, immoral people, and that having to pay money for a person to have sex with you, is somehow perverse, shameful, and unnatural. And of course men are taught that masturbation is a highly inferior, unacceptable substitute for "real" sex, even though masturbation is in fact the most "real", the most genuine, honest, and satisfying form of sex in existence. All of these perverse, societally induced notions, lead some men to decide to sexually attack women, in order to achieve sexual pleasure and climax for themselves. Yes, some rapists are primarily motivated by True Reality-based rage towards women, men, and/or humanity/society, based upon the personal torment and torture that they have been subjected to. And yes, many rapists have some degree of True Reality rage that plays a role in causing them to violently attack their victims. And yet in a majority of cases, the actual, primary reasons why the person chooses to commit rape(s), is rooted within the perverse, invalid societal lies, delusions, and doctrines that I have outlined above.

Again, I go back to the fact that all intimate sexual activity is marketed by society as being a "power" play, a dominance and submission activity, one individual imposing his will upon another individual. One person manipulating the emotions of the other person. One person exploiting, taking advantage of, the other person. This is how society markets intercourse, oral sex, and all other societally popularized/legitimized forms of sex. Rape is nothing more than these forms of victimization, taken to a slightly different, I hesitate to even say more severe, level. A majority of rapists do not even consider killing their victim. They do not break the victim's arms, or legs, or otherwise inflict deliberate physical injury upon non-sexual body parts. This is because their primary interest in and motivation for undertaking the rape attack, is to satisfy their own sexual needs/obsessions. Yes, many do enjoy the terroristic "power" and domination that they experience while committing the rape, witnessing the fear of their victim, the begging for mercy of their victim. But this "power trip", one individual imposing his will upon the other, in a "consensual" manner, is extremely common within all types of interactive sexual encounters. It is in no way restricted to rape. Many consensual sex acts between people, involve one of the people deriving pleasure from hurting, causing pain, imposing his will, upon the other person. This is true for the non-consensual act of rape, as well. It does not mean that the only reason, or the primary reason, that the vast majority of people who chose to commit rape do so, is because they want to physically hurt or torture their victim. It is a very real reason, one of several reasons, in most rape cases, but it is not the primary reason, in most cases. It is the fault of society that many men are unable to find a way to satisfy their sexual needs without having to resort to rape. If masturbation were sanctified as a glorious way to enjoy sexual bliss, which it is, if patronizing prostitutes was decreed to be a wonderful, honorable activity, a majority of people who currently commit sexually motivated rapes, would not commit such rapes. But again, we must not forget that all people who commit acts of violence and harm upon others, are tortured victims themselves, and some are primarily motivated by True Reality rage and hate. This is true for rapists, for child sex abusers, for murderers. However, there is a unique aspect and element to "sex crimes", and it is the perverse, invalid societal decrees and teachings regarding sex, sexuality, sexual pleasure, and "appropriate" sexual activity, which plays an extremely powerful role in directly causing a majority of all "sex crimes" that do occur, to occur.

I want to say a few words about AIDS here. AIDS, Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome, is a disease of the immune system, that is spread from person to person in several different ways, with some types of intimate sexual contact being a primary method of transmission. There have been many rumors over the years, that the disease of AIDS was deliberately created by scientists acting on behalf of a societal leadership, and intended to be used perhaps as a weapon of war, perhaps to try and kill off certain unpopular racial groups within a society, perhaps to kill off certain groups of people within a society who refuse to conform their behaviors and lifestyle choices, to societal decrees and demands. I am certainly not in a position to know for certain whether the disease of AIDS is in fact a malevolent, deliberate creation of a societal leadership. But I do know for certain that most societies are limitlessly, genocidally, evil. And most societal leaders would leap at the chance to create such a biological weapon, specifically designed to kill off an "enemy", or more likely, to kill off undesired, demonized groups of citizen-slaves within the society itself, who are deemed to pose a threat to the toxic and diseased primary agenda, of the society in question. Embracing these Truths, together with the limited information concerning the origins of AIDS that have been uncovered, it is clear to me that there is a very real, good chance, that this disease was deliberately created by human beings.

What truly astounds me is that even where the issue of AIDS is concerned, masturbation, the safest, best way to achieve sexual pleasure and release, is still demonized and shunned. You citizen-slaves are instructed to avoid certain sexual activities that carry a high risk of AIDS transmission, and yet when it comes to intercourse you are simply told to "wear a condom" to protect yourself. Either wear a condom, or "abstain" from having sex, those are the options given to you by society, and there is literally no mention of masturbation, which makes a million times more sense than either of the other two options. Whatever limited protection from this lifelong and fatal disease a condom might provide, cannot come close to matching the 100% degree of protection that comes via choosing the masturbation option. The other societal instruction, to abstain from having sex, is certain to result in unnecessary trauma, frustration, and eventual failure, since most people have a sexual drive that must be satisfied sooner or later, in one way or another. In advocating abstinence, but not masturbation, society is guaranteeing that many people who try to embrace the abstinence path will eventually end up engaging in intimate sexual contact, unsafe contact, with other people. This is because abstinence, as taught by society, is simply not sustainable for any lengthy period of time, for most people. Masturbation is sustainable for a lifetime, a glorious lifetime, I might add. But abstinence is not sustainable, therefore instructing people to stay safe and avoid AIDS by abstaining from sex, without in the same breath overtly encouraging and promoting masturbation, is completely ridiculous and nonsensical. It's almost like telling a person to "abstain from drinking water". The instruction is simply not sustainable over a long period of time, and therefore it not only offers no long-term protection from AIDS, but it also overtly causes and encourages people to eventually engage in intimate sexual contact that often carries a serious risk of transmission of this disease.

I want to restate the single most important Forbidden Truth of this essay: There is absolutely no valid link between sex and love, between sex and friendship, or between sex and nurturing, supportive relationships between human beings. Sex is an individualistic act, undertaken by people to get their own biological, physical, and/or emotional needs met. It is an inherently selfish act, as it should be. You eat because you are hungry, that is selfishness. You have sex because you want to experience the unique physical/emotional sensations that you can experience/enjoy only by having sex. This reflects the exact same form of benevolent selfishness, as eating food does. The links that society has created between sex and love, between sex and friendship, between sex and nurturing relationships, are invalid, illegitimate, untrue, and genocidally harmful/abusive to billions of individual humans, throughout the world.

Proving that there is absolutely no inherent link between sex and humanistic love, between sex and friendship, etc..., is incredibly easy and obvious, to any sane thinker. Consider the issue of fetishes. Some people achieve the greatest degree of sexual pleasure, simply by fondling, thinking about, developing fantasies about, a shoe, a piece of lingerie, a lock of hair, a gun, a piece of rope, etc... These things are not human, they are not alive, and yet they provide the ultimate in sexual excitement/release, to some people. Other people specifically feel hate for the people they have sex with. They consider their sexuality to be a weapon, and use this weapon to try and hurt other people. They specifically feel hate, not love, towards the people they have sex with, and yet this in no way diminishes the degree of sexual pleasure and satisfaction that they may achieve. Most people have friends, people that they feel emotional affection towards. But they don't have sex with all of their friends. Is the strength of their emotional bond of friendship/affection limited or diminished by the fact that they do not have sex with a particular friend of theirs?? No, of course not! Far more benevolent/affectionate relationships are ruined and destroyed when and if the two individuals decide to take the "next logical step" and have sex with each other, than are strengthened and enhanced by this step. This is because there is nothing logical or natural about seeking to strengthen a benevolent relationship by having sex. Sex has no intrinsic link to friendship or affection, and it has absolutely no link of any kind to "love", because romantic love is nothing but an artificial, invalid construct of society. Having sex with a person you feel affection towards, is more likely to harm the relationship, than to strengthen the relationship. Why? Because achieving sexual pleasure and release is an inherently individualistic activity. And every human being has a totally unique mindset which causes them to achieve the ultimate in sexual release/pleasure, in a unique way. If two people who like each other a lot have sex, it is very likely that each person will feel they must adjust the pace of their sexual arousal, to modify and compromise their own sexual experience, in order to accommodate the person that they are having sex with. This is very likely to give rise to frustration, lack of satisfaction, anger, resentment, sooner or later, causing harm to the relationship, often causing the entire relationship to collapse. And on top of all this, society decrees that all individual members of a "couple" relationship, need to have sex at the request/demand of the other person in the relationship! If the wife wants to have sex, society tells the husband that he needs to agree to have sex with her, regardless of whether he is feeling sexually aroused or in the mood to have sex. Same goes for the hubby who wants to have sex, wife is told by society, "you have an obligation to have sex with your husband. And this exact same insane decree applies to live-in lover relationships, and even to ongoing sexual relationships in which the two people live apart. How utterly perverse! Each person is expected to sacrifice their own sexual freedom and autonomy, while accepting the bizarre notion that they are obligated to have sex not when they wish, but when their spouse or regular sexual partner wants to have sex. This literally guarantees that neither person will ever be able to enjoy an ideal sexual experience, on an ongoing basis. It is the introduction of sex into relationships, that most often causes the relationship to suffer harm, or to collapse. A perfectly good, extremely nurturing friendship is destroyed, because society perversely and invalidly decrees interactive sexual contact to be the "next logical step" for the relationship to progress to.

The only argument that society makes to the above Truths is that it's not "normal" for people to be sexually attracted to shoes, it's not "normal" for people to have sex with people that they hate, it's not "normal" for people who like each other as friends, to start resenting and hating each other after they start having interactive sex. It's not "normal" for people to restrict all of their sexual activity to solo masturbation. This argument is ridiculous! It is the shallowest, most obvious and blatant form of lie-based societal coercion, imaginable. Having already terroristically convinced you citizen-slaves that you must make act and be "normal", society arbitrarily imposes upon you whatever artificial standards of normalcy it wishes, for the purpose of causing you to alter and modify your behaviors and your beliefs, to the behaviors and beliefs that your malevolent society is interested in promoting and popularizing. So, having sex with a shoe is decreed abnormal, because society wants you to have sex with other human beings. Having sex with people that you hate is decreed abnormal, because it contradicts the primary myth used by society to get people to have sex with each other, the myth of romantic love. Growing to hate and resent a person after you start having sex with them is decreed abnormal, because this Truth would serve to discourage people from having sex with each other. Being a compulsive masturbator is decreed to be abnormal, extremely abnormal in fact, because the thought of a lot of people embracing this Superior lifestyle, fills societal leaders with absolute terror. So, the entire notion of what is "normal", in all aspects of life, as put forth by societal decree, has absolutely no legitimacy or validity. It is nothing more than a malevolently terroristic tool, employed by society for the purpose of causing you creatures to restrict and limit your behavioral and lifestyle choices, to coerce you into agreeing to suppress, deny, reject Truth, and to impose utterly ridiculous and unnatural behavioral restrictions upon yourselves.

Every single type of attempt by society to regulate, control, influence, or dictate the type of sex that their citizen-slaves engage in, the frequency of sexual activity that people engage in, the gender, age, racial background of the person you choose to have sex with, including the demonization of some types of sex, such as masturbation, and the promotion of other types of sex and sexual regulations, such as intercourse, getting married, or living with the person you have sex with, constitutes utter and complete fascism. Outrageously, every single society on planet earth, in the 21st century, is indeed actively and on a constant, daily basis, in a frenzied fashion, engaged in this utterly fascist repression of all citizen-slaves who live within the society. Animals have sex with each other, based upon Natural Instinct. There are no "intellectual rules and regulations". Instinct rules. This is natural and appropriate. Within the genetically diseased species known as humanity, natural instinct has been lost, replaced by perverse intellectual fascism, as terroristically imposed by the most malevolent group of human beings that exists, those who have sought and attained leadership status within society. The loss of genetic health and normalcy was likely caused, in part, by malevolent societal influence. But this genetic loss, while very serious and carrying extremely negative consequences, was not a fatal blow, as regards sexual freedom and happiness. The fatal blow came when your societal leaders chose to try and replace this natural instinct with terroristic, lie-based, intellectual fascism, and you broken creatures happily chose to embrace these efforts, literally helping your society to rob you of your freedom, autonomy, and ability to try and seek, find, and embrace a life path that involves pure, personal Truth, rather than artificial, poisoned, invalid, myth-based, terroristically imposed fascist ideology and belief.